|
Jump to Table of Contents
CIRCULAR A-21
(Revised 05/10/04)
CIRCULAR NO. A-21
Revised
TO THE
HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT:
Cost Principles for Educational Institutions
1.
Purpose. This Circular establishes principles for determining costs
applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational
institutions. The principles deal with the subject of cost
determination, and make no attempt to identify the circumstances or
dictate the extent of agency and institutional participation in the
financing of a particular project. The principles are designed to
provide that the Federal Government bear its fair share of total costs,
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
except where restricted or prohibited by law. Agencies are not expected
to place additional restrictions on individual items of cost. Provision
for profit or other increment above cost is outside the scope of this
Circular.
2.
Supersession. The Circular supersedes Federal Management Circular 73 8,
dated December 19, 1973. FMC 73 8 is revised and reissued under its
original designation of OMB Circular No. A 21.
3.
Applicability.
-
All Federal
agencies that sponsor research and development, training, and other
work at educational institutions shall apply the provisions of this
Circular in determining the costs incurred for such work. The
principles shall also be used as a guide in the pricing of fixed price
or lump sum agreements.
-
In addition, Federally Funded Research and
Development Centers associated with educational institutions shall be
required to comply with the Cost Accounting Standards, rules and
regulations issued by the Cost Accounting Standards Board, and set
forth in 48 CFR part 99; provided that they are subject thereto under
defense related contracts.
4.
Responsibilities. The successful application of cost accounting
principles requires development of mutual understanding between
representatives of educational institutions and of the Federal
Government as to their scope, implementation, and interpretation.
5.
Attachment. The principles and related policy guides are set forth in
the Attachment, "Principles for determining costs applicable to grants,
contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions."
6.
Effective date. The provisions of this Circular shall be
effective October 1, 1979, except for subsequent amendments incorporated
herein for which the effective dates were specified in these revisions
(47 FR 33658, 51 FR 20908, 51 FR 43487, 56 FR 50224, 58 FR 39996, 61 FR
20880, 63 FR 29786, 63 FR 57332, 65 FR 48566 and 69 FR 25970).
Institutions as of the start of their first fiscal year beginning after
that date shall implement the provisions. Earlier implementation, or a
delay in implementation of individual provisions, is permitted by mutual
agreement between an institution and the cognizant Federal agency.
7.
Inquiries. Further information concerning this Circular may be
obtained by contacting the Office of Federal Financial Management,
Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503, telephone (202)
395 3993.
Attachment

PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO GRANTS,
CONTRACTS, AND OTHER AGREEMENTS WITH
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A.
Purpose and scope
- Objectives
- Policy guides
- Application
- Inquiries
B.
Definition of terms
- Major functions of an institution
- Sponsored agreement
- Allocation
- Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs
C.
Basic considerations
- Composition of total costs
- Factors affecting allowability of costs
- Reasonable costs
- Allocable costs
- Applicable credits
- Costs incurred by State and local governments
- Limitations on allowance of costs
- Collection of unallowable costs
- Adjustment of previously negotiated F&A cost rates containing
unallowable costs
- Consistency in estimating, accumulating and reporting costs
- Consistency in allocating costs incurred for the same purpose
- Accounting for unallowable costs
- Cost accounting period
- Disclosure statement
D.
Direct costs
- General
- Application to sponsored agreements
E.
F&A costs
- General
- Criteria for distribution
F.
Identification and assignment
of F&A costs
- Definition of Facilities and Administration.
- Depreciation and use allowances
- Interest
- Operation and maintenance expenses
- General administration and general expenses
- Departmental administration expenses
- Sponsored projects administration
- Library expenses
- Student administration and services
- Offset for F&A expenses otherwise provided for by the Federal
Government
G.
Determination and application
of F&A cost rate or rates
- F&A cost pools
- The distribution basis
- Negotiated lump sum for F&A costs
- Predetermined rates for F&A costs
- Negotiated fixed rates and carry forward provisions
- Provisional and final rates for F&A costs
- Fixed rates for the life of the sponsored agreement
- Limitation on reimbursement of administrative costs
- Alternative method for administrative costs
- Individual rate components
- Negotiation and approval of F&A rate
- Standard format for submission
H.
Simplified method for small
institutions
- General
- Simplified procedure
I. Reserved
J.
General provisions for
selected items of cost
- Advertising and public relations costs
- Advisory councils
- Alcoholic beverages
- Alumni/ae activities
- Audit
and related services
- Bad
debts
- Bonding costs
- Commencement and convocation costs
- Communication costs
- Compensation for personal services
- Contingency provisions
- Deans
of faculty and graduate schools
- Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil proceedings, claims,
appeals and patent infringement
- Depreciation and use allowances
- Donations and contributions
- Employee morale, health, and welfare costs
- Entertainment costs
- Equipment and other capital expenditures
- Fines
and penalties
- Fund
raising and investment costs
- Gains
and losses on depreciable assets
- Goods
or services for personal use
- Housing and personal living expenses
- Idle
facilities and idle capacity
- Insurance and indemnification
- Interest
- Labor
relations costs
- Lobbying
- Losses
on other sponsored agreements or contracts
- Maintenance and repair costs
- Material and supplies costs
- Meetings and conferences
- Memberships, subscriptions and professional activity costs
- Patent
costs
- Plant
and homeland security costs
- Pre-agreement costs
- Professional service costs
- Proposal costs
- Publication and printing costs
- Rearrangement and alteration costs
- Reconversion costs
- Recruiting costs
- Rental
costs of buildings and equipment
- Royalties and other costs for use of patents
- Scholarships and student aid costs
- Selling and marketing
- Specialized service facilities
- Student activity costs
- Taxes
- Termination costs applicable to sponsored agreements
- Training costs
- Transportation costs
- Travel
costs
- Trustees
K. Certification of charges
Exhibit A List of
Colleges and Universities Subject to Section J.12.h of Circular A 21
Exhibit B Listing of
Institutions that are eligible for the utility cost adjustment
Exhibit C Examples of
"major project" where direct charging of administrative or clerical
staff salaries may be appropriate
Appendix A
CASB's Cost
Accounting Standards (CAS)
CAS 501:
Consistency in estimating, accumulating and reporting costs by
educational institutions.
CAS 502:
Consistency in allocating costs incurred for the same purpose by
educational institutions.
CAS 505:
Accounting for unallowable costs
CAS 506:
Cost accounting period
Appendix
B CASB's Disclosure Statement (DS 2)
Appendix
C Documentation Requirements for Facilities and Administrative (F&A)
Rate Proposals
PRINCIPLES FOR DETERMINING COSTS APPLICABLE TO GRANTS,
CONTRACTS, AND OTHER AGREEMENTS WITH
EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
A. Purpose and scope.
1. Objectives. This Attachment provides principles for
determining the costs applicable to research and development, training,
and other sponsored work performed by colleges and universities under
grants, contracts, and other agreements with the Federal Government.
These agreements are referred to as sponsored agreements.
2. Policy guides. The successful application of these
cost accounting principles requires development of mutual understanding
between representatives of universities and of the Federal Government as
to their scope, implementation, and interpretation. It is recognized
that
-
The arrangements
for Federal agency and institutional participation in the financing of
a research, training, or other project are properly subject to
negotiation between the agency and the institution concerned, in
accordance with such governmentwide criteria or legal requirements as
may be applicable.
-
Each institution,
possessing its own unique combination of staff, facilities, and
experience, should be encouraged to conduct research and educational
activities in a manner consonant with its own academic philosophies
and institutional objectives.
-
The dual role of
students engaged in research and the resulting benefits to sponsored
agreements are fundamental to the research effort and shall be
recognized in the application of these principles.
-
Each institution,
in the fulfillment of its obligations, should employ sound management
practices.
-
The application of
these cost accounting principles should require no significant changes
in the generally accepted accounting practices of colleges and
universities. However, the accounting practices of individual colleges
and universities must support the accumulation of costs as required by
the principles, and must provide for adequate documentation to support
costs charged to sponsored agreements.
-
Cognizant Federal
agencies involved in negotiating facilities and administrative (F&A)
cost rates and auditing should assure that institutions are generally
applying these cost accounting principles on a consistent basis. Where
wide variations exist in the treatment of a given cost item among
institutions, the reasonableness and equitableness of such treatments
should be fully considered during the rate negotiations and audit.
3. Application. These principles shall be used in
determining the allowable costs of work performed by colleges and
universities under sponsored agreements. The principles shall also be
used in determining the costs of work performed by such institutions
under subgrants, cost reimbursement subcontracts, and other awards made
to them under sponsored agreements. They also shall be used as a guide
in the pricing of fixed price contracts and subcontracts where costs are
used in determining the appropriate price. The principles do not apply
to:
-
Arrangements under
which Federal financing is in the form of loans, scholarships,
fellowships, traineeships, or other fixed amounts based on such items
as education allowance or published tuition rates and fees of an
institution.
-
Capitation awards.
-
Other awards under
which the institution is not required to account to the Federal
Government for actual costs incurred.
-
Conditional exemptions.
(1) OMB authorizes conditional exemption from OMB administrative
requirements and cost principles circulars for certain Federal
programs with statutorily authorized consolidated planning and
consolidated administrative funding, that are identified by a Federal
agency and approved by the head of the Executive department or
establishment. A Federal agency shall consult with OMB during its
consideration of whether to grant such an exemption.
(2) To promote efficiency in State and local program administration,
when Federal non entitlement programs with common purposes have
specific statutorily authorized consolidated planning and consolidated
administrative funding and where most of the State agency's resources
come from non Federal sources, Federal agencies may exempt these
covered State administered, non entitlement grant programs from
certain OMB grants management requirements. The exemptions would be
from all but the allocability of costs provisions of OMB Circulars A
87 (Attachment A, subsection C.3), "Cost Principles for State, Local,
and Indian Tribal Governments," A 21 (Section C, subpart 4), "Cost
Principles for Educational Institutions," and A 122 (Attachment A,
subsection A.4), "Cost Principles for Non Profit Organizations," and
from all of the administrative requirements provisions of OMB Circular
A 110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non Profit
Organizations," and the agencies' grants management common rule.
(3) When a Federal agency provides this flexibility, as a prerequisite
to a State's exercising this option, a State must adopt its own
written fiscal and administrative requirements for expending and
accounting for all funds, which are consistent with the provisions of
OMB Circular A 87, and extend such policies to all subrecipients.
These fiscal and administrative requirements must be sufficiently
specific to ensure that: funds are used in compliance with all
applicable Federal statutory and regulatory provisions, costs are
reasonable and necessary for operating these programs, and funds are
not be used for general expenses required to carry out other
responsibilities of a State or its subrecipients.
4. Inquiries.
All
inquiries from Federal agencies concerning the cost principles contained
in this Circular, including the administration and implementation of the
Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) (described in Sections C.10 through
C.13) and disclosure statement (DS 2) requirements, shall be addressed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of Federal
Financial Management, in coordination with the Cost Accounting Standard
Board (CASB) with respect to inquiries concerning CAS. Educational
institutions' inquiries should be addressed to the cognizant agency.
B. Definition of terms.
1. Major functions of an institution refers to
instruction, organized research, other sponsored activities and other
institutional activities as defined below:
-
Instruction means
the teaching and training activities of an institution. Except for
research training as provided in subsection b, this term includes all
teaching and training activities, whether they are offered for credits
toward a degree or certificate or on a non credit basis, and whether
they are offered through regular academic departments or separate
divisions, such as a summer school division or an extension division.
Also considered part of this major function are departmental research,
and, where agreed to, university research.
(1) Sponsored instruction and training means specific instructional or
training activity established by grant, contract, or cooperative
agreement. For purposes of the cost principles, this activity may be
considered a major function even though an institution's accounting
treatment may include it in the instruction function.
(2) Departmental research means research, development and scholarly
activities that are not organized research and, consequently, are not
separately budgeted and accounted for. Departmental research, for
purposes of this document, is not considered as a major function, but
as a part of the instruction function of the institution.
-
Organized research
means all research and development activities of an institution that
are separately budgeted and accounted for. It includes:
(1) Sponsored research means all research and development activities
that are sponsored by Federal and non Federal agencies and
organizations. This term includes activities involving the training of
individuals in research techniques (commonly called research training)
where such activities utilize the same facilities as other research
and development activities and where such activities are not included
in the instruction function.
(2) University research means all research and development activities
that are separately budgeted and accounted for by the institution
under an internal application of institutional funds. University
research, for purposes of this document, shall be combined with
sponsored research under the function of organized research.
-
Other sponsored
activities means programs and projects financed by Federal and non
Federal agencies and organizations which involve the performance of
work other than instruction and organized research. Examples of such
programs and projects are health service projects, and community
service programs. However, when any of these activities are undertaken
by the institution without outside support, they may be classified as
other institutional activities.
-
Other institutional activities means all
activities of an institution except:
(1) instruction, departmental research, organized research, and other
sponsored activities, as defined above;
(2) F&A cost activities identified in Section F; and
(3) specialized service facilities described in Section J.47. Other
institutional activities include operation of residence halls, dining
halls, hospitals and clinics, student unions, intercollegiate
athletics, bookstores, faculty housing, student apartments, guest
houses, chapels, theaters, public museums, and other similar auxiliary
enterprises. This definition also includes any other categories of
activities, costs of which are "unallowable" to sponsored agreements,
unless otherwise indicated in the agreements.
2. Sponsored agreement, for purposes of this Circular,
means any grant, contract, or other agreement between the institution
and the Federal Government.
3. Allocation means the process of assigning a cost,
or a group of costs, to one or more cost objective, in reasonable and
realistic proportion to the benefit provided or other equitable
relationship. A cost objective may be a major function of the
institution, a particular service or project, a sponsored agreement, or
a F&A cost activity, as described in Section F. The process may entail
assigning a cost(s) directly to a final cost objective or through one or
more intermediate cost objectives.
4. Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs, for the
purpose of this Circular, means costs that are incurred for common or
joint objectives and, therefore, cannot be identified readily and
specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional
activity, or any other institutional activity. F&A costs are synonymous
with "indirect" costs, as previously used in this Circular and as
currently used in Appendices A and B. The F&A cost categories are
described in Section F.1.
C. Basic considerations.
1. Composition of total costs. The cost of a sponsored
agreement is comprised of the allowable direct costs incident to its
performance, plus the allocable portion of the allowable F&A costs of
the institution, less applicable credits as described in subsection 5.
2. Factors affecting allowability of costs. The tests
of allowability of costs under these principles are: (a) they must be
reasonable; (b) they must be allocable to sponsored agreements under the
principles and methods provided herein; (c) they must be given
consistent treatment through application of those generally accepted
accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances; and (d) they
must conform to any limitations or exclusions set forth in these
principles or in the sponsored agreement as to types or amounts of cost
items.
3. Reasonable costs. A cost may be considered
reasonable if the nature of the goods or services acquired or applied,
and the amount involved therefore, reflect the action that a prudent
person would have taken under the circumstances prevailing at the time
the decision to incur the cost was made. Major considerations involved
in the determination of the reasonableness of a cost are: (a) whether or
not the cost is of a type generally recognized as necessary for the
operation of the institution or the performance of the sponsored
agreement; (b) the restraints or requirements imposed by such factors as
arm's length bargaining, Federal and State laws and regulations, and
sponsored agreement terms and conditions; (c) whether or not the
individuals concerned acted with due prudence in the circumstances,
considering their responsibilities to the institution, its employees,
its students, the Federal Government, and the public at large; and, (d)
the extent to which the actions taken with respect to the incurrence of
the cost are consistent with established institutional policies and
practices applicable to the work of the institution generally, including
sponsored agreements.
4. Allocable costs.
-
A cost is allocable
to a particular cost objective (i.e., a specific function, project,
sponsored agreement, department, or the like) if the goods or services
involved are chargeable or assignable to such cost objective in
accordance with relative benefits received or other equitable
relationship. Subject to the foregoing, a cost is allocable to a
sponsored agreement if (1) it is incurred solely to advance the work
under the sponsored agreement; (2) it benefits both the sponsored
agreement and other work of the institution, in proportions that can
be approximated through use of reasonable methods, or (3) it is
necessary to the overall operation of the institution and, in light of
the principles provided in this Circular, is deemed to be assignable
in part to sponsored projects. Where the purchase of equipment or
other capital items is specifically authorized under a sponsored
agreement, the amounts thus authorized for such purchases are
assignable to the sponsored agreement regardless of the use that may
subsequently be made of the equipment or other capital items involved.
-
Any costs allocable
to a particular sponsored agreement under the standards provided in
this Circular may not be shifted to other sponsored agreements in
order to meet deficiencies caused by overruns or other fund
considerations, to avoid restrictions imposed by law or by terms of
the sponsored agreement, or for other reasons of convenience.
-
Any costs allocable
to activities sponsored by industry, foreign governments or other
sponsors may not be shifted to federally sponsored agreements.
-
Allocation and
documentation standard.
(1) Cost principles. The recipient institution is responsible for
ensuring that costs charged to a sponsored agreement are allowable,
allocable, and reasonable under these cost principles.
(2) Internal controls. The institution's financial management system
shall ensure that no one person has complete control over all aspects
of a financial transaction.
(3) Direct cost allocation principles. If a cost benefits two or more
projects or activities in proportions that can be determined without
undue effort or cost, the cost should be allocated to the projects
based on the proportional benefit. If a cost benefits two or more
projects or activities in proportions that cannot be determined
because of the interrelationship of the work involved, then,
notwithstanding subsection b, the costs may be allocated or
transferred to benefited projects on any reasonable basis, consistent
with subsections d. (1) and (2).
(4) Documentation. Federal requirements for documentation are
specified in this Circular, Circular A 110, "Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and Other Non Profit Organizations," and
specific agency policies on cost transfers. If the institution
authorizes the principal investigator or other individual to have
primary responsibility, given the requirements of subsection d. (2),
for the management of sponsored agreement funds, then the
institution's documentation requirements for the actions of those
individuals (e.g., signature or initials of the principal investigator
or designee or use of a password) will normally be considered
sufficient.
5. Applicable credits.
-
The term
"applicable credits" refers to those receipts or negative expenditures
that operate to offset or reduce direct or F&A cost items. Typical
examples of such transactions are: purchase discounts, rebates, or
allowances; recoveries or indemnities on losses; and adjustments of
overpayments or erroneous charges. This term also includes
"educational discounts" on products or services provided specifically
to educational institutions, such as discounts on computer equipment,
except where the arrangement is clearly and explicitly identified as a
gift by the vendor.
-
In some instances, the amounts received from
the Federal Government to finance institutional activities or service
operations should be treated as applicable credits. Specifically, the
concept of netting such credit items against related expenditures
should be applied by the institution in determining the rates or
amounts to be charged to sponsored agreements for services rendered
whenever the facilities or other resources used in providing such
services have been financed directly, in whole or in part, by Federal
funds. (See Sections F.10, J.14, and J.47 for areas of potential
application in the matter of direct Federal financing.)
6. Costs incurred by State and local governments.
Costs incurred or paid by State or local governments on behalf of their
colleges and universities for fringe benefit programs, such as pension
costs and FICA and any other costs specifically incurred on behalf of,
and in direct benefit to, the institutions, are allowable costs of such
institutions whether or not these costs are recorded in the accounting
records of the institutions, subject to the following:
-
The costs meet the
requirements of subsections 1 through 5.
-
The costs are
properly supported by cost allocation plans in accordance with
applicable Federal cost accounting principles.
-
The costs are not
otherwise borne directly or indirectly by the Federal Government.
7. Limitations on allowance of costs. Sponsored
agreements may be subject to statutory requirements that limit the
allowance of costs. When the maximum amount allowable under a limitation
is less than the total amount determined in accordance with the
principles in this Circular, the amount not recoverable under a
sponsored agreement may not be charged to other sponsored agreements.
8. Collection of unallowable costs, excess costs due
to noncompliance with cost policies, increased costs due to failure to
follow a disclosed accounting practice and increased costs resulting
from a change in cost accounting practice. The following costs shall be
refunded (including interest) in accordance with applicable Federal
agency regulations:
-
Costs specifically
identified as unallowable in Section J, either directly or indirectly,
and charged to the Federal Government.
-
Excess costs due to
failure by the educational institution to comply with the cost
policies in this Circular.
-
Increased costs due
to a noncompliant cost accounting practice used to estimate,
accumulate, or report costs.
-
Increased costs
resulting from a change in accounting practice.
9. Adjustment of previously negotiated F&A cost rates
containing unallowable costs. Negotiated F&A cost rates based on a
proposal later found to have included costs that (a) are unallowable as
specified by (i) law or regulation, (ii) Section J of this Circular,
(iii) terms and conditions of sponsored agreements, or (b) are
unallowable because they are clearly not allocable to sponsored
agreements, shall be adjusted, or a refund shall be made, in accordance
with the requirements of this section. These adjustments or refunds are
designed to correct the proposals used to establish the rates and do not
constitute a reopening of the rate negotiation. The adjustments or
refunds will be made regardless of the type of rate negotiated
(predetermined, final, fixed, or provisional).
-
For rates covering
a future fiscal year of the institution, the unallowable costs will be
removed from the F&A cost pools and the rates appropriately adjusted.
-
For rates covering
a past period, the Federal share of the unallowable costs will be
computed for each year involved and a cash refund (including interest
chargeable in accordance with applicable regulations) will be made to
the Federal Government. If cash refunds are made for past periods
covered by provisional or fixed rates, appropriate adjustments will be
made when the rates are finalized to avoid duplicate recovery of the
unallowable costs by the Federal Government.
-
For rates covering
the current period, either a rate adjustment or a refund, as described
in subsections a and b, shall be required by the cognizant agency. The
choice of method shall be at the discretion of the cognizant agency,
based on its judgment as to which method would be most practical.
-
The amount or
proportion of unallowable costs included in each year's rate will be
assumed to be the same as the amount or proportion of unallowable
costs included in the base year proposal used to establish the rate.
10. Consistency in estimating, accumulating and
reporting costs.
-
An educational
institution's practices used in estimating costs in pricing a proposal
shall be consistent with the educational institution's cost accounting
practices used in accumulating and reporting costs.
-
An educational
institution's cost accounting practices used in accumulating and
reporting actual costs for a sponsored agreement shall be consistent
with the educational institution's practices used in estimating costs
in pricing the related proposal or application.
-
The grouping of
homogeneous costs in estimates prepared for proposal purposes shall
not per se be deemed an inconsistent application of cost accounting
practices under subsection a when such costs are accumulated and
reported in greater detail on an actual cost basis during performance
of the sponsored agreement.
-
Appendix A also
reflects this requirement, along with the purpose, definitions, and
techniques for application, all of which are authoritative.
11. Consistency in allocating costs incurred for the
same purpose.
-
All costs incurred
for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are either direct costs
only or F&A costs only with respect to final cost objectives. No final
cost objective shall have allocated to it as a cost any cost, if other
costs incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, have been
included as a direct cost of that or any other final cost objective.
Further, no final cost objective shall have allocated to it as a
direct cost any cost, if other costs incurred for the same purpose, in
like circumstances, have been included in any F&A cost pool to be
allocated to that or any other final cost objective.
-
Appendix A reflects
this requirement along with its purpose, definitions, and techniques
for application, illustrations and interpretations, all of which are
authoritative.
12. Accounting for unallowable costs.
-
Costs expressly
unallowable or mutually agreed to be unallowable, including costs
mutually agreed to be unallowable directly associated costs, shall be
identified and excluded from any billing, claim, application, or
proposal applicable to a sponsored agreement.
-
Costs which
specifically become designated as unallowable as a result of a written
decision furnished by a Federal official pursuant to sponsored
agreement disputes procedures shall be identified if included in or
used in the computation of any billing, claim, or proposal applicable
to a sponsored agreement. This identification requirement applies also
to any costs incurred for the same purpose under like circumstances as
the costs specifically identified as unallowable under either this
subsection or subsection a.
-
Costs which, in a
Federal official's written decision furnished pursuant to sponsored
agreement disputes procedures, are designated as unallowable directly
associated costs of unallowable costs covered by either subsection a
or b shall be accorded the identification required by subsection b.
-
The costs of any
work project not contractually authorized by a sponsored agreement,
whether or not related to performance of a proposed or existing
sponsored agreement, shall be accounted for, to the extent
appropriate, in a manner which permits ready separation from the costs
of authorized work projects.
-
All unallowable
costs covered by subsections a through d shall be subject to the same
cost accounting principles governing cost allocability as allowable
costs. In circumstances where these unallowable costs normally would
be part of a regular F&A cost allocation base or bases, they shall
remain in such base or bases. Where a directly associated cost is part
of a category of costs normally included in a F&A cost pool that shall
be allocated over a base containing the unallowable cost with which it
is associated, such a directly associated cost shall be retained in
the F&A cost pool and be allocated through the regular allocation
process.
-
Where the total of
the allocable and otherwise allowable costs exceeds a limitation of
cost or ceiling price provision in a sponsored agreement, full direct
and F&A cost allocation shall be made to the sponsored agreement cost
objective, in accordance with established cost accounting practices
and standards which regularly govern a given entity's allocations to
sponsored agreement cost objectives. In any determination of a cost
overrun, the amount thereof shall be identified in terms of the excess
of allowable costs over the ceiling amount, rather than through
specific identification of particular cost items or cost elements.
-
Appendix A reflects
this requirement, along with its purpose, definitions, techniques for
application, and illustrations of this standard, all of which are
authoritative.
13. Cost accounting period.
-
Educational
institutions shall use their fiscal year as their cost accounting
period, except that:
(1) Costs of a F&A function which exists for only a part of a cost
accounting period may be allocated to cost objectives of that same
part of the period on the basis of data for that part of the cost
accounting period if the cost is: (i) material in amount, (ii)
accumulated in a separate F&A cost pool or expense pool, and (iii)
allocated on the basis of an appropriate direct measure of the
activity or output of the function during that part of the period.
(2) An annual period other than the fiscal year may, upon mutual
agreement with the Federal Government, be used as the cost accounting
period if the use of such period is an established practice of the
educational institution and is consistently used for managing and
controlling revenues and disbursements, and appropriate accruals,
deferrals or other adjustments are made with respect to such annual
periods.
(3) A transitional cost accounting period other than a year shall be
used whenever a change of fiscal year occurs.
-
An educational
institution shall follow consistent practices in the selection of the
cost accounting period or periods in which any types of expense and
any types of adjustment to expense (including prior period
adjustments) are accumulated and allocated.
-
The same cost
accounting period shall be used for accumulating costs in a F&A cost
pool as for establishing its allocation base, except that the Federal
Government and educational institution may agree to use a different
period for establishing an allocation base, provided:
(1) The practice is necessary to obtain significant administrative
convenience,
(2) The practice is consistently followed by the educational
institution,
(3) The annual period used is representative of the activity of the
cost accounting period for which the F&A costs to be allocated are
accumulated, and
(4) The practice can reasonably be estimated to provide a distribution
to cost objectives of the cost accounting period not materially
different from that which otherwise would be obtained.
-
Appendix A reflects
this requirement, along with its purpose, definitions, techniques for
application and illustrations, all of which are authoritative.
14. Disclosure Statement.
-
Educational
institutions that received aggregate sponsored agreements totaling $25
million or more subject to this Circular during their most recently
completed fiscal year shall disclose their cost accounting practices
by filing a Disclosure Statement (DS 2), which is reproduced in
Appendix B. With the approval of the cognizant agency, an educational
institution may meet the DS 2 submission by submitting the DS 2 for
each business unit that received $25 million or more in sponsored
agreements.
-
The DS 2 shall be
submitted to the cognizant agency with a copy to the educational
institution's audit cognizant office.
-
Educational
institutions receiving $25 million or more in sponsored agreements
that are not required to file a DS 2 pursuant to 48 CFR 9903.202 1
shall file a DS 2 covering the first fiscal year beginning after the
publication date of this revision, within six months after the end of
that fiscal year. Extensions beyond the above due date may be granted
by the cognizant agency on a case by case basis.
-
Educational
institutions are responsible for maintaining an accurate DS 2 and
complying with disclosed cost accounting practices. Educational
institutions must file amendments to the DS 2 when disclosed practices
are changed to comply with a new or modified standard, or when
practices are changed for other reasons. Amendments of a DS 2 may be
submitted at any time. If the change is expected to have a material
impact on the educational institution's negotiated F&A cost rates, the
revision shall be approved by the cognizant agency before it is
implemented. Resubmission of a complete, updated DS 2 is discouraged
except when there are extensive changes to disclosed practices.
-
Cost and funding
adjustments. Cost adjustments shall be made by the cognizant agency if
an educational institution fails to comply with the cost policies in
this Circular or fails to consistently follow its established or
disclosed cost accounting practices when estimating, accumulating or
reporting the costs of sponsored agreements, if aggregate cost impact
on sponsored agreements is material. The cost adjustment shall
normally be made on an aggregate basis for all affected sponsored
agreements through an adjustment of the educational institution's
future F&A costs rates or other means considered appropriate by the
cognizant agency. Under the terms of CAS covered contracts,
adjustments in the amount of funding provided may also be required
when the estimated proposal costs were not determined in accordance
with established cost accounting practices.
-
Overpayments.
Excess amounts paid in the aggregate by the Federal Government under
sponsored agreements due to a noncompliant cost accounting practice
used to estimate, accumulate, or report costs shall be credited or
refunded, as deemed appropriate by the cognizant agency. Interest
applicable to the excess amounts paid in the aggregate during the
period of noncompliance shall also be determined and collected in
accordance with applicable Federal agency regulations.
-
Compliant cost
accounting practice changes. Changes from one compliant cost
accounting practice to another compliant practice that are approved by
the cognizant agency may require cost adjustments if the change has a
material effect on sponsored agreements and the changes are deemed
appropriate by the cognizant agency.
-
Responsibilities.
The cognizant agency shall:
(1) Determine cost adjustments for all sponsored agreements in the
aggregate on behalf of the Federal Government. Actions of the
cognizant agency official in making cost adjustment determinations
shall be coordinated with all affected Federal agencies to the extent
necessary.
(2) Prescribe guidelines and establish internal procedures to promptly
determine on behalf of the Federal Government that a DS 2 adequately
discloses the educational institution's cost accounting practices and
that the disclosed practices are compliant with applicable CAS and the
requirements of this Circular.
(3) Distribute to all affected agencies any DS 2 determination of
adequacy and/or noncompliance.
D. Direct costs.
1. General. Direct costs are those costs that can be
identified specifically with a particular sponsored project, an
instructional activity, or any other institutional activity, or that can
be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high
degree of accuracy. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like
circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or F&A
costs. Where an institution treats a particular type of cost as a direct
cost of sponsored agreements, all costs incurred for the same purpose in
like circumstances shall be treated as direct costs of all activities of
the institution.
2. Application to sponsored agreements. Identification
with the sponsored work rather than the nature of the goods and services
involved is the determining factor in distinguishing direct from F&A
costs of sponsored agreements. Typical costs charged directly to a
sponsored agreement are the compensation of employees for performance of
work under the sponsored agreement, including related fringe benefit
costs to the extent they are consistently treated, in like
circumstances, by the institution as direct rather than F&A costs; the
costs of materials consumed or expended in the performance of the work;
and other items of expense incurred for the sponsored agreement,
including extraordinary utility consumption. The cost of materials
supplied from stock or services rendered by specialized facilities or
other institutional service operations may be included as direct costs
of sponsored agreements, provided such items are consistently treated,
in like circumstances, by the institution as direct rather than F&A
costs, and are charged under a recognized method of computing actual
costs, and conform to generally accepted cost accounting practices
consistently followed by the institution.
E. F&A costs.
1. General. F&A costs are those that are incurred for
common or joint objectives and therefore cannot be identified readily
and specifically with a particular sponsored project, an instructional
activity, or any other institutional activity. See Section F.1 for a
discussion of the components of F&A costs.
2. Criteria for distribution.
-
Base period. A base
period for distribution of F&A costs is the period during which the
costs are incurred. The base period normally should coincide with the
fiscal year established by the institution, but in any event the base
period should be so selected as to avoid inequities in the
distribution of costs.
-
Need for cost
groupings. The overall objective of the F&A cost allocation process is
to distribute the F&A costs described in Section F to the major
functions of the institution in proportions reasonably consistent with
the nature and extent of their use of the institution's resources. In
order to achieve this objective, it may be necessary to provide for
selective distribution by establishing separate groupings of cost
within one or more of the F&A cost categories referred to in
subsection 1. In general, the cost groupings established within a
category should constitute, in each case, a pool of those items of
expense that are considered to be of like nature in terms of their
relative contribution to (or degree of remoteness from) the particular
cost objectives to which distribution is appropriate. Cost groupings
should be established considering the general guides provided in
subsection c. Each such pool or cost grouping should then be
distributed individually to the related cost objectives, using the
distribution base or method most appropriate in the light of the
guides set forth in subsection d.
-
General
considerations on cost groupings. The extent to which separate cost
groupings and selective distribution would be appropriate at an
institution is a matter of judgment to be determined on a case by case
basis. Typical situations which may warrant the establishment of two
or more separate cost groupings (based on account classification or
analysis) within an F&A cost category include but are not limited to
the following:
(1) Where certain items or categories of expense relate solely to one
of the major functions of the institution or to less than all
functions, such expenses should be set aside as a separate cost
grouping for direct assignment or selective allocation in accordance
with the guides provided in subsections b and d.
(2) Where any types of expense ordinarily treated as general
administration or departmental administration are charged to sponsored
agreements as direct costs, expenses applicable to other activities of
the institution when incurred for the same purposes in like
circumstances must, through separate cost groupings, be excluded from
the F&A costs allocable to those sponsored agreements and included in
the direct cost of other activities for cost allocation purposes.
(3) Where it is determined that certain expenses are for the support
of a service unit or facility whose output is susceptible of
measurement on a workload or other quantitative basis, such expenses
should be set aside as a separate cost grouping for distribution on
such basis to organized research, instructional, and other activities
at the institution or within the department.
(4) Where activities provide their own purchasing, personnel
administration, building maintenance or similar service, the
distribution of general administration and general expenses, or
operation and maintenance expenses to such activities should be
accomplished through cost groupings which include only that portion of
central F&A costs (such as for overall management) which are properly
allocable to such activities.
(5) Where the institution elects to treat fringe benefits as F&A
charges, such costs should be set aside as a separate cost grouping
for selective distribution to related cost objectives.
(6) The number of separate cost groupings within a category should be
held within practical limits, after taking into consideration the
materiality of the amounts involved and the degree of precision
attainable through less selective methods of distribution.
-
Selection of
distribution method.
(1) Actual conditions must be taken into account in selecting the
method or base to be used in distributing individual cost groupings.
The essential consideration in selecting a base is that it be the one
best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost objectives in
accordance with benefits derived; a traceable cause and effect
relationship; or logic and reason, where neither benefit nor cause and
effect relationship is determinable.
(2) Where a cost grouping can be identified directly with the cost
objective benefited, it should be assigned to that cost objective.
(3) Where the expenses in a cost grouping are more general in nature,
the distribution may be based on a cost analysis study which results
in an equitable distribution of the costs. Such cost analysis studies
may take into consideration weighting factors, population, or space
occupied if appropriate. Cost analysis studies, however, must (a) be
appropriately documented in sufficient detail for subsequent review by
the cognizant Federal agency, (b) distribute the costs to the related
cost objectives in accordance with the relative benefits derived, (c)
be statistically sound, (d) be performed specifically at the
institution at which the results are to be used, and (e) be reviewed
periodically, but not less frequently than every two years, updated if
necessary, and used consistently. Any assumptions made in the study
must be stated and explained. The use of cost analysis studies and
periodic changes in the method of cost distribution must be fully
justified.
(4) If a cost analysis study is not performed, or if the study does
not result in an equitable distribution of the costs, the distribution
shall be made in accordance with the appropriate base cited in Section
F, unless one of the following conditions is met: (a) it can be
demonstrated that the use of a different base would result in a more
equitable allocation of the costs, or that a more readily available
base would not increase the costs charged to sponsored agreements, or
(b) the institution qualifies for, and elects to use, the simplified
method for computing F&A cost rates described in Section H.
(5) Notwithstanding subsection (3), effective July 1, 1998, a cost
analysis or base other than that in Section F shall not be used to
distribute utility or student services costs. Instead, subsections
F.4.c and F.4.d may be used in the recovery of utility costs.
-
Order of
distribution.
(1) F&A costs are the broad categories of costs discussed in Section
F.1.
(2) Depreciation and use allowances, operation and maintenance
expenses, and general administrative and general expenses should be
allocated in that order to the remaining F&A cost categories as well
as to the major functions and specialized service facilities of the
institution. Other cost categories may be allocated in the order
determined to be most appropriate by the institutions. When cross
allocation of costs is made as provided in subsection (3), this order
of allocation does not apply.
(3) Normally an F&A cost category will be considered closed once it
has been allocated to other cost objectives, and costs may not be
subsequently allocated to it. However, a cross allocation of costs
between two or more F&A cost categories may be used if such allocation
will result in a more equitable allocation of costs. If a cross
allocation is used, an appropriate modification to the composition of
the F&A cost categories described in Section F is required.
F. Identification and assignment of F&A costs.
1. Definition of Facilities and Administration. F&A
costs are broad categories of costs. "Facilities" is defined as
depreciation and use allowances, interest on debt associated with
certain buildings, equipment and capital improvements, operation and
maintenance expenses, and library expenses. "Administration" is defined
as general administration and general expenses, departmental
administration, sponsored projects administration, student
administration and services, and all other types of expenditures not
listed specifically under one of the subcategories of Facilities
(including cross allocations from other pools).
2. Depreciation and use allowances.
-
The expenses under
this heading are the portion of the costs of the institution's
buildings, capital improvements to land and buildings, and equipment
which are computed in accordance with Section J.14.
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses included
in this category shall be allocated in the following manner:
(1) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used exclusively in
the conduct of a single function, and on capital improvements and
equipment used in such buildings, shall be assigned to that function.
(2) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings used for more than one
function, and on capital improvements and equipment used in such
buildings, shall be allocated to the individual functions performed in
each building on the basis of usable square feet of space, excluding
common areas such as hallways, stairwells, and rest rooms.
(3) Depreciation or use allowances on buildings, capital improvements
and equipment related to space (e.g., individual rooms, laboratories)
used jointly by more than one function (as determined by the users of
the space) shall be treated as follows. The cost of each jointly used
unit of space shall be allocated to benefiting functions on the basis
of:
(a) the employee full time equivalents (FTEs) or salaries and wages
of those individual functions benefiting from the use of that space; or
(b) institution wide employee FTEs or salaries and wages applicable to
the benefiting major functions (see Section B.1) of the institution.
(4) Depreciation or use allowances on certain capital improvements to
land, such as paved parking areas, fences, sidewalks, and the like, not
included in the cost of buildings, shall be allocated to user categories
of students and employees on a full time equivalent basis. The amount
allocated to the student category shall be assigned to the instruction
function of the institution. The amount allocated to the employee
category shall be further allocated to the major functions of the
institution in proportion to the salaries and wages of all employees
applicable to those functions.
-
Large research
facilities. The following provisions apply to large research
facilities that are included in F&A rate proposals negotiated after
January 1, 2000, and on which the design and construction begin after
July 1, 1998. Large facilities, for this provision, are defined as
buildings with construction costs of more than $10 million. The
determination of the Federal participation (use) percentage in a
building is based on institution's estimates of building use over its
life, and is made during the planning phase for the building.
(1) When an institution has large research facilities, of which 40
percent or more of total assignable space is expected for Federal use,
the institution must maintain an adequate review and approval process
to ensure that construction costs are reasonable. The review process
shall address and document relevant factors affecting construction
costs, such as:
-- Life cycle costs
-- Unique research needs
-- Special building needs
-- Building site preparation
-- Environmental consideration
-- Federal construction code requirements
-- Competitive procurement practices
The approval process shall include review and approval of the projects
by the institution's Board of Trustees (which can also be called Board
of Directors, Governors or Regents) or other independent entities.
(2) For research facilities costing more than $25 million, of which 50
percent or more of total assignable space is expected for Federal use,
the institution must document the review steps performed to assure
that construction costs are reasonable. The review should include an
analysis of construction costs and a comparison of these costs with
relevant construction data, including the National Science Foundation
data for research facilities based on its biennial survey, "Science
and Engineering Facilities at Colleges and Universities.” The
documentation must be made available for review by Federal
negotiators, when requested.
3. Interest. Interest on debt associated with certain
buildings, equipment and capital improvements, as defined in Sections
J.25, shall be classified as an expenditure under the category
Facilities. These costs shall be allocated in the same manner as the
depreciation or use allowances on the buildings, equipment and capital
improvements to which the interest relates.
4. Operation and maintenance expenses.
-
The expenses under
this heading are those that have been incurred for the administration,
supervision, operation, maintenance, preservation, and protection of
the institution's physical plant. They include expenses normally
incurred for such items as janitorial and utility services; repairs
and ordinary or normal alterations of buildings, furniture and
equipment; care of grounds; maintenance and operation of buildings and
other plant facilities; security; earthquake and disaster
preparedness; environmental safety; hazardous waste disposal;
property, liability and all other insurance relating to property;
space and capital leasing; facility planning and management; and,
central receiving. The operation and maintenance expense category
should also include its allocable share of fringe benefit costs,
depreciation and use allowances, and interest costs.
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses included
in this category shall be allocated in the same manner as described in
subsection 2.b for depreciation and use allowances.
-
For F&A rates
negotiated on or after July 1, 1998, an institution that previously
employed a utility special cost study in its most recently negotiated
F&A rate proposal in accordance with Section E.2.d, may add a utility
cost adjustment (UCA) of 1.3 percentage points to its negotiated
overall F&A rate for organized research. Exhibit B displays the list
of eligible institutions. The allocation of utility costs to the
benefiting functions shall otherwise be made in the same manner as
described in subsection F.4.b. Beginning on July 1, 2002, Federal
agencies shall reassess periodically the eligibility of institutions
to receive the UCA.
-
Beginning on July
1, 2002, Federal agencies may receive applications for utilization of
the UCA from institutions not subject to the provisions of subsection
F.4.c.
5. General administration and general expenses.
-
The expenses under
this heading are those that have been incurred for the general
executive and administrative offices of educational institutions and
other expense of a general character which do not relate solely to any
major function of the institution; i.e., solely to (1) instruction,
(2) organized research, (3) other sponsored activities, or (4) other
institutional activities. The general administration and general
expense category should also include its allocable share of fringe
benefit costs, operation and maintenance expense, depreciation and use
allowances, and interest costs. Examples of general administration and
general expenses include: those expenses incurred by administrative
offices that serve the entire university system of which the
institution is a part; central offices of the institution such as the
President's or Chancellor's office, the offices for institution wide
financial management, business services, budget and planning,
personnel management, and safety and risk management; the office of
the General Counsel; and, the operations of the central administrative
management information systems. General administration and general
expenses shall not include expenses incurred within non university
wide deans' offices, academic departments, organized research units,
or similar organizational units. (See subsection 6, Departmental
administration expenses.)
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses included
in this category shall be grouped first according to common major
functions of the institution to which they render services or provide
benefits. The aggregate expenses of each group shall then be allocated
to serviced or benefited functions on the modified total cost basis.
Modified total costs consist of the same elements as those in Section
G.2. When an activity included in this F&A cost category provides a
service or product to another institution or organization, an
appropriate adjustment must be made to either the expenses or the
basis of allocation or both, to assure a proper allocation of costs.
6. Departmental administration expenses.
-
The expenses under
this heading are those that have been incurred for administrative and
supporting services that benefit common or joint departmental
activities or objectives in academic deans' offices, academic
departments and divisions, and organized research units. Organized
research units include such units as institutes, study centers, and
research centers. Departmental administration expenses are subject to
the following limitations.
(1) Academic deans' offices. Salaries and operating expenses are
limited to those attributable to administrative functions.
(2) Academic departments:
(a) Salaries and fringe benefits attributable to the administrative
work (including bid and proposal preparation) of faculty (including
department heads), and other professional personnel conducting research
and/or instruction, shall be allowed at a rate of 3.6 percent of
modified total direct costs. This category does not include professional
business or professional administrative officers. This allowance shall
be added to the computation of the F&A cost rate for major functions in
Section G; the expenses covered by the allowance shall be excluded from
the departmental administration cost pool. No documentation is required
to support this allowance.
(b) Other administrative and supporting expenses incurred within
academic departments are allowable provided they are treated
consistently in like circumstances. This would include expenses such as
the salaries of secretarial and clerical staffs, the salaries of
administrative officers and assistants, travel, office supplies,
stockrooms, and the like.
(3) Other fringe benefit costs applicable to the salaries and wages
included in subsections (1) and (2) are allowable, as well as an
appropriate share of general administration and general expenses,
operation and maintenance expenses, and depreciation and/or use
allowances.
(4) Federal agencies may authorize reimbursement of additional costs for
department heads and faculty only in exceptional cases where an
institution can demonstrate undue hardship or detriment to project
performance.
-
The following
guidelines apply to the determination of departmental administrative
costs as direct or F&A costs.
(1) In developing the departmental administration cost pool, special
care should be exercised to ensure that costs incurred for the same
purpose in like circumstances are treated consistently as either
direct or F&A costs. For example, salaries of technical staff,
laboratory supplies (e.g., chemicals), telephone toll charges,
animals, animal care costs, computer costs, travel costs, and
specialized shop costs shall be treated as direct cost wherever
identifiable to a particular cost objective. Direct charging of these
costs may be accomplished through specific identification of
individual costs to benefiting cost objectives, or through recharge
centers or specialized service facilities, as appropriate under the
circumstances.
(2) The salaries of administrative and clerical staff should normally
be treated as F&A costs. Direct charging of these costs may be
appropriate where a major project or activity explicitly budgets for
administrative or clerical services and individuals involved can be
specifically identified with the project or activity. "Major project"
is defined as a project that requires an extensive amount of
administrative or clerical support, which is significantly greater
than the routine level of such services provided by academic
departments. Some examples of major projects are described in Exhibit
C.
(3) Items such as office supplies, postage, local telephone costs, and
memberships shall normally be treated as F&A costs.
-
In the absence of the alternatives provided for
in Section E.2.d, the expenses included in this category shall be
allocated as follows:
(1) The administrative expenses of the dean's office of each college
and school shall be allocated to the academic departments within that
college or school on the modified total cost basis.
(2) The administrative expenses of each academic department, and the
department's share of the expenses allocated in subsection (1) shall
be allocated to the appropriate functions of the department on the
modified total cost basis.
7. Sponsored projects administration.
-
The expenses under
this heading are limited to those incurred by a separate
organization(s) established primarily to administer sponsored
projects, including such functions as grant and contract
administration (Federal and non Federal), special security,
purchasing, personnel, administration, and editing and publishing of
research and other reports. They include the salaries and expenses of
the head of such organization, assistants, and immediate staff,
together with the salaries and expenses of personnel engaged in
supporting activities maintained by the organization, such as stock
rooms, stenographic pools and the like. This category also includes an
allocable share of fringe benefit costs, general administration and
general expenses, operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation/use
allowances. Appropriate adjustments will be made for services provided
to other functions or organizations.
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses included
in this category shall be allocated to the major functions of the
institution under which the sponsored projects are conducted on the
basis of the modified total cost of sponsored projects.
-
An appropriate
adjustment shall be made to eliminate any duplicate charges to
sponsored agreements when this category includes similar or identical
activities as those included in the general administration and general
expense category or other F&A cost items, such as accounting,
procurement, or personnel administration.
8. Library expenses.
-
The expenses under
this heading are those that have been incurred for the operation of
the library, including the cost of books and library materials
purchased for the library, less any items of library income that
qualify as applicable credits under Section C.5. The library expense
category should also include the fringe benefits applicable to the
salaries and wages included therein, an appropriate share of general
administration and general expense, operation and maintenance expense,
and depreciation and use allowances. Costs incurred in the purchases
of rare books (museum type books) with no value to sponsored
agreements should not be allocated to them.
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses included
in this category shall be allocated first on the basis of primary
categories of users, including students, professional employees, and
other users.
(1) The student category shall consist of full time equivalent
students enrolled at the institution, regardless of whether they earn
credits toward a degree or certificate.
(2) The professional employee category shall consist of all faculty
members and other professional employees of the institution, on a full
time equivalent basis.
(3) The other users category shall consist of all other users of
library facilities.
-
Amount allocated in
subsection b shall be assigned further as follows:
(1) The amount in the student category shall be assigned to the
instruction function of the institution.
(2) The amount in the professional employee category shall be assigned
to the major functions of the institution in proportion to the
salaries and wages of all faculty members and other professional
employees applicable to those functions.
(3) The amount in the other users category shall be assigned to the
other institutional activities function of the institution.
9. Student administration and services.
-
The expenses under
this heading are those that have been incurred for the administration
of student affairs and for services to students, including expenses of
such activities as deans of students, admissions, registrar,
counseling and placement services, student advisers, student health
and infirmary services, catalogs, and commencements and convocations.
The salaries of members of the academic staff whose responsibilities
to the institution require administrative work that benefits sponsored
projects may also be included to the extent that the portion charged
to student administration is determined in accordance with Section
J.10. This expense category also includes the fringe benefit costs
applicable to the salaries and wages included therein, an appropriate
share of general administration and general expenses, operation and
maintenance, and use allowances and/or depreciation.
-
In the absence of
the alternatives provided for in Section E.2.d, the expenses in this
category shall be allocated to the instruction function, and
subsequently to sponsored agreements in that function.
10. Offset for F&A expenses otherwise provided for by
the Federal Government.
-
The items to be
accumulated under this heading are the reimbursements and other
payments from the Federal Government that are made to the institution
to support solely, specifically, and directly, in whole or in part,
any of the administrative or service activities described in
subsections 2 through 9.
-
The items in this
group shall be treated as a credit to the affected individual F&A cost
category before that category is allocated to benefiting functions.
G. Determination and application of F&A cost rate or
rates.
1. F&A cost pools.
-
(1) Subject to
subsection b, the separate categories of F&A costs allocated to each
major function of the institution as prescribed in Section F shall be
aggregated and treated as a common pool for that function. The amount
in each pool shall be divided by the distribution base described in
subsection 2 to arrive at a single F&A cost rate for each function.
(2) The rate for each function is used to distribute F&A costs to
individual sponsored agreements of that function. Since a common pool
is established for each major function of the institution, a separate
F&A cost rate would be established for each of the major functions
described in Section B.1 under which sponsored agreements are carried
out.
(3) Each institution's F&A cost rate process must be appropriately
designed to ensure that Federal sponsors do not in any way subsidize
the F&A costs of other sponsors, specifically activities sponsored by
industry and foreign governments. Accordingly, each allocation method
used to identify and allocate the F&A cost pools, as described in
Sections E.2 and F.2 through F.9, must contain the full amount of the
institution's modified total costs or other appropriate units of
measurement used to make the computations. In addition, the final rate
distribution base (as defined in subsection 2) for each major function
(organized research, instruction, etc., as described in Section B.1)
shall contain all the programs or activities that utilize the F&A
costs allocated to that major function. At the time a F&A cost
proposal is submitted to a cognizant Federal agency, each institution
must describe the process it uses to ensure that Federal funds are not
used to subsidize industry and foreign government funded programs.
-
In some instances a
single rate basis for use across the board on all work within a major
function at an institution may not be appropriate. A single rate for
research, for example, might not take into account those different
environmental factors and other conditions which may affect
substantially the F&A costs applicable to a particular segment of
research at the institution. A particular segment of research may be
that performed under a single sponsored agreement or it may consist of
research under a group of sponsored agreements performed in a common
environment. The environmental factors are not limited to the physical
location of the work. Other important factors are the level of the
administrative support required, the nature of the facilities or other
resources employed, the scientific disciplines or technical skills
involved, the organizational arrangements used, or any combination
thereof. Where a particular segment of a sponsored agreement is
performed within an environment which appears to generate a
significantly different level of F&A costs, provisions should be made
for a separate F&A cost pool applicable to such work. The separate F&A
cost pool should be developed during the regular course of the rate
determination process and the separate F&A cost rate resulting
therefrom should be utilized; provided it is determined that (1) such
F&A cost rate differs significantly from that which would have been
obtained under subsection a, and (2) the volume of work to which such
rate would apply is material in relation to other sponsored agreements
at the institution.
2. The distribution basis. F&A costs shall be
distributed to applicable sponsored agreements and other benefiting
activities within each major function (see Section B.1) on the basis of
modified total direct costs, consisting of all salaries and wages,
fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and subgrants
and subcontracts up to the first $25,000 of each subgrant or subcontract
(regardless of the period covered by the subgrant or subcontract).
Equipment, capital expenditures, charges for patient care and tuition
remission, rental costs, scholarships, and fellowships as well as the
portion of each subgrant and subcontract in excess of $25,000 shall be
excluded from modified total direct costs. Other items may only be
excluded where necessary to avoid a serious inequity in the distribution
of F&A costs. For this purpose, a F&A cost rate should be determined for
each of the separate F&A cost pools developed pursuant to subsection 1.
The rate in each case should be stated as the percentage that the amount
of the particular F&A cost pool is of the modified total direct costs
identified with such pool.
3. Negotiated lump sum for F&A costs. A negotiated
fixed amount in lieu of F&A costs may be appropriate for self contained,
off campus, or primarily subcontracted activities where the benefits
derived from an institution's F&A services cannot be readily determined.
Such negotiated F&A costs will be treated as an offset before allocation
to instruction, organized research, other sponsored activities, and
other institutional activities. The base on which such remaining
expenses are allocated should be appropriately adjusted.
4. Predetermined rates for F&A costs. Public Law 87
638 (76 Stat. 437) authorizes the use of predetermined rates in
determining the "indirect costs" (F&A costs in this Circular) applicable
under research agreements with educational institutions. The stated
objectives of the law are to simplify the administration of cost type
research and development contracts (including grants) with educational
institutions, to facilitate the preparation of their budgets, and to
permit more expeditious closeout of such contracts when the work is
completed. In view of the potential advantages offered by this
procedure, negotiation of predetermined rates for F&A costs for a period
of two to four years should be the norm in those situations where the
cost experience and other pertinent facts available are deemed
sufficient to enable the parties involved to reach an informed judgment
as to the probable level of F&A costs during the ensuing accounting
periods.
5. Negotiated fixed rates and carry forward
provisions. When a fixed rate is negotiated in advance for a fiscal year
(or other time period), the over or under recovery for that year may be
included as an adjustment to the F&A cost for the next rate negotiation.
When the rate is negotiated before the carry forward adjustment is
determined, the carry forward amount may be applied to the next
subsequent rate negotiation. When such adjustments are to be made, each
fixed rate negotiated in advance for a given period will be computed by
applying the expected F&A costs allocable to sponsored agreements for
the forecast period plus or minus the carry forward adjustment (over or
under recovery) from the prior period, to the forecast distribution
base. Unrecovered amounts under lump sum agreements or cost sharing
provisions of prior years shall not be carried forward for consideration
in the new rate negotiation. There must, however, be an advance
understanding in each case between the institution and the cognizant
Federal agency as to whether these differences will be considered in the
rate negotiation rather than making the determination after the
differences are known. Further, institutions electing to use this carry
forward provision may not subsequently change without prior approval of
the cognizant Federal agency. In the event that an institution returns
to a postdetermined rate, any over or under recovery during the period
in which negotiated fixed rates and carry forward provisions were
followed will be included in the subsequent postdetermined rates. Where
multiple rates are used, the same procedure will be applicable for
determining each rate.
6. Provisional and final rates for F&A costs. Where
the cognizant agency determines that cost experience and other pertinent
facts do not justify the use of predetermined rates, or a fixed rate
with a carry forward, or if the parties cannot agree on an equitable
rate, a provisional rate shall be established. To prevent substantial
overpayment or underpayment, the provisional rate may be adjusted by the
cognizant agency during the institution's fiscal year. Predetermined or
fixed rates may replace provisional rates at any time prior to the close
of the institution's fiscal year. If a provisional rate is not replaced
by a predetermined or fixed rate prior to the end of the institution's
fiscal year, a final rate will be established and upward or downward
adjustments will be made based on the actual allowable costs incurred
for the period involved.
7. Fixed rates for the life of the sponsored
agreement.
-
Federal agencies
shall use the negotiated rates for F&A costs in effect at the time of
the initial award throughout the life of the sponsored agreement.
"Life" for the purpose of this subsection means each competitive
segment of a project. A competitive segment is a period of years
approved by the Federal funding agency at the time of the award. If
negotiated rate agreements do not extend through the life of the
sponsored agreement at the time of the initial award, then the
negotiated rate for the last year of the sponsored agreement shall be
extended through the end of the life of the sponsored agreement. Award
levels for sponsored agreements may not be adjusted in future years as
a result of changes in negotiated rates.
-
When an educational
institution does not have a negotiated rate with the Federal
Government at the time of the award (because the educational
institution is a new grantee or the parties cannot reach agreement on
a rate), the provisional rate used at the time of the award shall be
adjusted once a rate is negotiated and approved by the cognizant
agency.
8. Limitation on reimbursement of administrative
costs.
-
Notwithstanding the
provisions of subsection 1.a, the administrative costs charged to
sponsored agreements awarded or amended (including continuation and
renewal awards) with effective dates beginning on or after the start
of the institution's first fiscal year which begins on or after
October 1, 1991, shall be limited to 26% of modified total direct
costs (as defined in subsection 2) for the total of General
Administration and General Expenses, Departmental Administration,
Sponsored Projects Administration, and Student Administration and
Services (including their allocable share of depreciation and/or use
allowances, interest costs, operation and maintenance expenses, and
fringe benefits costs, as provided by Sections F.5, F.6, F.7 and F.9)
and all other types of expenditures not listed specifically under one
of the subcategories of facilities in Section F.
-
Existing F&A cost
rates that affect institutions' fiscal years which begin on or after
October 1, 1991, shall be unilaterally amended by the cognizant
Federal agency to reflect the cost limitation in subsection a.
-
Permanent rates
established prior to this revision that have been amended in
accordance with subsection b may be renegotiated. However, no such
renegotiated rate may exceed the rate which would have been in effect
if the agreement had remained in effect; nor may the administrative
portion of any renegotiated rate exceed the limitation in subsection
a.
-
Institutions should
not change their accounting or cost allocation methods which were in
effect on May 1, 1991, if the effect is to: (i) change the charging of
a particular type of cost from F&A to direct, or (ii) reclassify
costs, or increase allocations, from the administrative pools
identified in subsection to the other F&A cost pools or fringe
benefits. Cognizant Federal agencies are authorized to permit changes
where an institution's charging practices are at variance with
acceptable practices followed by a substantial majority of other
institutions.
9. Alternative method for administrative costs.
-
Notwithstanding the
provisions of subsection 1.a, an institution may elect to claim fixed
allowance for the "Administration" portion of F&A costs. The allowance
could be either 24% of modified total direct costs or a percentage
equal to 95% of the most recently negotiated fixed or predetermined
rate for the cost pools included under "Administration" as defined in
Section F.1, whichever is less, provided that no accounting or cost
allocation changes with the effects described in subsection 8.d have
occurred. Under this alternative, no cost proposal need be prepared
for the "Administration" portion of the F&A cost rate nor is further
identification or documentation of these costs required (see
subsection c). Where a negotiated F&A cost agreement includes this
alternative, an institution shall make no further charges for the
expenditure categories described in Sections F.5, F.6, F.7 and F.9.
-
In negotiations of
rates for subsequent periods, an institution that has elected the
option of subsection a may continue to exercise it at the same rate
without further identification or documentation of costs, provided
that no accounting or cost allocation changes with the effects
described in subsection 8.d have occurred.
-
If an institution
elects to accept a threshold rate, it is not required to perform a
detailed analysis of its administrative costs. However, in order to
compute the facilities components of its F&A cost rate, the
institution must reconcile its F&A cost proposal to its financial
statements and make appropriate adjustments and reclassifications to
identify the costs of each major function as defined in Section B.1,
as well as to identify and allocate the facilities components.
Administrative costs that are not identified as such by the
institution's accounting system (such as those incurred in academic
departments) will be classified as instructional costs for purposes of
reconciling F&A cost proposals to financial statements and allocating
facilities costs.
10. Individual rate components.
In order
to satisfy the requirements of Section J.14 and to provide mutually
agreed upon information for management purposes, each F&A cost rate
negotiation or determination shall include development of a rate for
each F&A cost pool as well as the overall F&A cost rate.
11. Negotiation and approval of F&A rate.
-
Cognizant agency
assignments. "A cognizant agency" means the Federal agency responsible
for negotiating and approving F&A rates for an educational institution
on behalf of all Federal agencies.
(1) Cost negotiation cognizance is assigned to the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Department of Defense's Office
of Naval Research (DOD), normally depending on which of the two
agencies (HHS or DOD) provides more funds to the educational
institution for the most recent three years. Information on funding
shall be derived from relevant data gathered by the National Science
Foundation. In cases where neither HHS nor DOD provides Federal
funding to an educational institution, the cognizant agency assignment
shall default to HHS. Notwithstanding the method for cognizance
determination described above, other arrangements for cognizance of a
particular educational institution may also be based in part on the
types of research performed at the educational institution and shall
be decided based on mutual agreement between HHS and DOD.
(2) Cognizant assignments as of December 31, 1995, shall continue in
effect through educational institutions' fiscal years ending during
1997, or the period covered by negotiated agreements in effect on
December 31, 1995, whichever is later, except for those educational
institutions with cognizant agencies other than HHS or DOD. Cognizance
for these educational institutions shall transfer to HHS or DOD at the
end of the period covered by the current negotiated rate agreement.
After cognizance is established, it shall continue for a five year
period.
-
Acceptance of
rates. The negotiated rates shall be accepted by all Federal agencies.
Only under special circumstances, when required by law or regulation,
may an agency use a rate different from the negotiated rate for a
class of sponsored agreements or a single sponsored agreement.
-
Correcting
deficiencies. The cognizant agency shall negotiate changes needed to
correct systems deficiencies relating to accountability for sponsored
agreements. Cognizant agencies shall address the concerns of other
affected agencies, as appropriate.
-
Resolving
questioned costs. The cognizant agency shall conduct any necessary
negotiations with an educational institution regarding amounts
questioned by audit that are due the Federal Government related to
costs covered by a negotiated agreement.
-
Reimbursement.
Reimbursement to cognizant agencies for work performed under Circular
A 21 may be made by reimbursement billing under the Economy Act, 31
U.S.C. 1535.
-
Procedure for
establishing facilities and administrative rates. The cognizant agency
shall arrange with the educational institution to provide copies of
rate proposals to all interested agencies. Agencies wanting such
copies should notify the cognizant agency. Rates shall be established
by one of the following methods:
(1) Formal negotiation. The cognizant agency is responsible for
negotiating and approving rates for an educational institution on
behalf of all Federal agencies. Non cognizant Federal agencies, which
award sponsored agreements to an educational institution, shall notify
the cognizant agency of specific concerns (i.e., a need to establish
special cost rates) that could affect the negotiation process. The
cognizant agency shall address the concerns of all interested
agencies, as appropriate. A pre negotiation conference may be
scheduled among all interested agencies, if necessary. The cognizant
agency shall then arrange a negotiation conference with the
educational institution.
(2) Other than formal negotiation. The cognizant agency and
educational institution may reach an agreement on rates without a
formal negotiation conference; for example, through correspondence or
use of the simplified method described in this Circular.
-
Formalizing
determinations and agreements. The cognizant agency shall formalize
all determinations or agreements reached with an educational
institution and provide copies to other agencies having an interest.
-
Disputes and
disagreements. Where the cognizant agency is unable to reach agreement
with an educational institution with regard to rates or audit
resolution, the appeal system of the cognizant agency shall be
followed for resolution of the disagreement.
12. Standard Format for Submission. For facilities
and administrative (F&A) rate proposals submitted on or after July 1,
2001, educational institutions shall use the standard format, shown in
Appendix C, to submit their F&A rate proposal to the cognizant agency.
The cognizant agency may, on an institution by institution basis, grant
exceptions from all or portions of Part II of the standard format
requirement. This requirement does not apply to educational institutions
that use the simplified method for calculating F&A rates, as described
in Section H.
H. Simplified method for small institutions.
1. General.
-
Where the total
direct cost of work covered by Circular A 21 at an institution does
not exceed $10 million in a fiscal year, the use of the simplified
procedure described in subsections 2 or 3, may be used in determining
allowable F&A costs. Under this simplified procedure, the
institution's most recent annual financial report and immediately
available supporting information shall be utilized as basis for
determining the F&A cost rate applicable to all sponsored agreements.
The institution may use either the salaries and wages (see subsection
2) or modified total direct costs (see subsection 3) as distribution
basis.
-
The simplified
procedure should not be used where it produces results that appear
inequitable to the Federal Government or the institution. In any such
case, F&A costs should be determined through use of the regular
procedure.
2. Simplified procedure Salaries and wages base.
-
Establish the total
amount of salaries and wages paid to all employees of the institution.
-
Establish an F&A
cost pool consisting of the expenditures (exclusive of capital items
and other costs specifically identified as unallowable) that
customarily are classified under the following titles or their
equivalents:
(1) General administration and general expenses (exclusive of costs of
student administration and services, student activities, student aid,
and scholarships).
(2) Operation and maintenance of physical plant; and depreciation and
use allowances; after appropriate adjustment for costs applicable to
other institutional activities.
(3) Library.
(4) Department administration expenses, which will be computed as 20
percent of the salaries and expenses of deans and heads of
departments.
In those cases where expenditures classified under subsection (1) have
previously been allocated to other institutional activities, they may
be included in the F&A cost pool. The total amount of salaries and
wages included in the F&A cost pool must be separately identified.
-
Establish a salary
and wage distribution base, determined by deducting from the total of
salaries and wages as established in subsection a the amount of
salaries and wages included under subsection b.
-
Establish the F&A
cost rate, determined by dividing the amount in the F&A cost pool,
subsection b, by the amount of the distribution base, subsection c.
-
Apply the F&A cost
rate to direct salaries and wages for individual agreements to
determine the amount of F&A costs allocable to such agreements.
3. Simplified procedure Modified total direct cost
base.
-
Establish the total
costs incurred by the institution for the base period.
-
Establish a F&A
cost pool consisting of the expenditures (exclusive of capital items
and other costs specifically identified as unallowable) that
customarily are classified under the following titles or their
equivalents:
(1) General administration and general expenses (exclusive of costs of
student administration and services, student activities, student aid,
and scholarships).
(2) Operation and maintenance of physical plant; and depreciation and
use allowances; after appropriate adjustment for costs applicable to
other institutional activities.
(3) Library.
(4) Department administration expenses, which will be computed as 20
percent of the salaries and expenses of deans and heads of
departments.
In those cases where expenditures classified under subsection (1) have
previously been allocated to other institutional activities, they may
be included in the F&A cost pool. The modified total direct costs
amount included in the F&A cost pool must be separately identified.
-
Establish a
modified total direct cost distribution base, as defined in Section
G.2, that consists of all institution's direct functions.
-
Establish the F&A
cost rate, determined by dividing the amount in the F&A cost pool,
subsection b, by the amount of the distribution base, subsection c.
-
Apply the F&A cost
rate to the modified total direct costs for individual agreements to
determine the amount of F&A costs allocable to such agreements.
J. General provisions for selected items of cost.
Sections
1 through 54 provide principles to be applied in establishing the
allowability of certain items involved in determining cost. These
principles should apply irrespective of whether a particular item of
cost is properly treated as direct cost or F&A cost. Failure to mention
a particular item of cost is not intended to imply that it is either
allowable or unallowable; rather, determination as to allowability in
each case should be based on the treatment provided for similar or
related items of cost. In case of a discrepancy between the provisions
of a specific sponsored agreement and the provisions below, the
agreement should govern.
1.
Advertising and public relations costs.
-
The term
advertising costs means the costs of advertising media and corollary
administrative costs. Advertising media include magazines, newspapers,
radio and television, direct mail, exhibits, electronic or computer
transmittals, and the like.
-
The term public
relations includes community relations and means those activities
dedicated to maintaining the image of the institution or maintaining
or promoting understanding and favorable relations with the community
or public at large or any segment of the public.
-
The only allowable
advertising costs are those that are solely for:
(1) The recruitment of personnel required for the performance by the
institution of obligations arising under a sponsored agreement (See
also subsection b. of section J.42, Recruiting);
(2) The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a
sponsored agreement;
(3) The disposal of scrap or surplus materials acquired in the
performance of a sponsored agreement except when non-Federal entities
are reimbursed for disposal costs at a predetermined amount; or
(4) Other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the
sponsored agreement.
-
The only allowable
public relations costs are:
(1) Costs specifically required by the sponsored agrrement;
(2) Costs of communicating with the public and press pertaining to
specific activities or accomplishments which result from performance
of sponsored agreements (these costs are considered necessary as part
of the outreach effort for the sponsored agreement); or
(3) Costs of conducting general liaison with news media and government
public relations officers, to the extent that such activities are
limited to communication and liaison necessary keep the public
informed on matters of public concern, such as notices of Federal
contract/grant awards, financial matters, etc.
-
Costs identified in
subsections c and d if incurred for more than one sponsored agreement
or for both sponsored work and other work of the institution, are
allowable to the extent that the principles in sections D. (“Direct
Costs”) and E. (“F & A Costs”) are observed.
-
Unallowable
advertising and public relations costs include the following:
(1) All advertising and public relations costs other than as specified
in subsections 1.c, 1.d and 1.e.
(2) Costs of meetings, conventions, convocations, or other events
related to other activities of the institution, including:
(a) Costs of displays, demonstrations, and exhibits;
(b) Costs of meeting rooms, hospitality suites, and other special
facilities used in conjunction with shows and other special events; and
(c) Salaries and wages of employees engaged in setting up and displaying
exhibits, making demonstrations, and providing briefings;
(3) Costs of promotional items and memorabilia, including models, gifts,
and souvenirs;
(4) Costs of advertising and public relations designed solely to promote
the institution.
2.
Advisory councils.
Costs
incurred by advisory councils or committees are allowable as a direct
cost where authorized by the Federal awarding agency or as an indirect
cost where allocable to sponsored agreements.
3.
Alcoholic beverages.
Costs of
alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
4.
Alumni/ae activities.
Costs
incurred for, or in support of, alumni/ae activities and similar
services are unallowable.
5.
Audit costs and related services.
-
The costs of audits
required by, and performed in accordance with, the Single Audit Act,
as implemented by Circular A-133, "Audits of States, Local
Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations” are allowable. Also see 31
USC 7505(b) and section ___.230 (“Audit Costs”) of Circular A-133.
-
Other audit costs
are allowable if included in an indirect cost rate proposal, or if
specifically approved by the awarding agency as a direct cost to an
award.
-
The cost of
agreed-upon procedures engagements to monitor subrecipients who are
exempted from A-133 under section ___.200(d) are allowable, subject to
the conditions listed in A-133, section ___.230 (b)(2).
6.
Bad
Debt.
Bad
debts, including losses (whether actual or estimated) arising from
uncollectable accounts and other claims, related collection costs, and
related legal costs, are unallowable.
7.
Bonding costs.
-
Bonding costs arise
when the Federal Government requires assurance against financial loss
to itself or others by reason of the act or default of the
institution. They arise also in instances where the institution
requires similar assurance. Included are such bonds as bid,
performance, payment, advance payment, infringement, and fidelity
bonds.
-
Costs of bonding
required pursuant to the terms of the award are allowable.
-
Costs of bonding
required by the institution in the general conduct of its operations
are allowable to the extent that such bonding is in accordance with
sound business practice and the rates and premiums are reasonable
under the circumstances.
8.
Commencement and convocation costs.
Costs
incurred for commencements and convocations are unallowable, except as
provided for in Section F.9.
9.
Communication costs.
Costs
incurred for telephone services, local and long distance telephone
calls, telegrams, postage, messenger, electronic or computer transmittal
services and the like are allowable.
10.
Compensation for personal services.
-
General.
Compensation for personal services covers all amounts paid currently
or accrued by the institution for services of employees rendered
during the period of performance under sponsored agreements. Such
amounts include salaries, wages, and fringe benefits (see subsection
f). These costs are allowable to the extent that the total
compensation to individual employees conforms to the established
policies of the institution, consistently applied, and provided that
the charges for work performed directly on sponsored agreements and
for other work allocable as F&A costs are determined and supported as
provided below. Charges to sponsored agreements may include reasonable
amounts for activities contributing and intimately related to work
under the agreements, such as delivering special lectures about
specific aspects of the ongoing activity, writing reports and
articles, participating in appropriate seminars, consulting with
colleagues and graduate students, and attending meetings and
conferences. Incidental work (that in excess of normal for the
individual), for which supplemental compensation is paid by an
institution under institutional policy, need not be included in the
payroll distribution systems described below, provided such work and
compensation are separately identified and documented in the financial
management system of the institution.
-
Payroll
distribution.
(1) General Principles.
(a) The distribution of salaries and wages, whether treated as
direct or F&A costs, will be based on payrolls documented in accordance
with the generally accepted practices of colleges and universities.
Institutions may include in a residual category all activities that are
not directly charged to sponsored agreements, and that need not be
distributed to more than one activity for purposes of identifying F&A
costs and the functions to which they are allocable. The components of
the residual category are not required to be separately documented.
(b) The apportionment of employees' salaries and wages which are
chargeable to more than one sponsored agreement or other cost objective
will be accomplished by methods which will-
(1) be in accordance with Sections A.2 and C;
(2) produce an equitable distribution of charges for employee's
activities; and
(3) distinguish the employees' direct activities from their F&A
activities.
(c) In the use of any methods for apportioning salaries, it is
recognized that, in an academic setting, teaching, research, service,
and administration are often inextricably intermingled. A precise
assessment of factors that contribute to costs is not always feasible,
nor is it expected. Reliance, therefore, is placed on estimates in which
a degree of tolerance is appropriate.
(d) There is no single best method for documenting the distribution of
charges for personal services. Methods for apportioning salaries and
wages, however, must meet the criteria specified in subsection b.(2).
Examples of acceptable methods are contained in subsection c. Other
methods that meet the criteria specified in subsection b.(2) also shall
be deemed acceptable, if a mutually satisfactory alternative agreement
is reached.
(2) Criteria for Acceptable Methods.
(a) The payroll distribution system will
(i) be incorporated into the official records of the institution;
(ii) reasonably reflect the activity for which the employee is
compensated by the institution; and
(iii) encompass both sponsored and all other activities on an integrated
basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records. (Compensation for
incidental work described in subsection a need not be included.)
(b) The method must recognize the principle of after the fact
confirmation or determination so that costs distributed represent actual
costs, unless a mutually satisfactory alternative agreement is reached.
Direct cost activities and F&A cost activities may be confirmed by
responsible persons with suitable means of verification that the work
was performed. Confirmation by the employee is not a requirement for
either direct or F&A cost activities if other responsible persons make
appropriate confirmations.
(c) The payroll distribution system will allow confirmation of activity
allocable to each sponsored agreement and each of the categories of
activity needed to identify F&A costs and the functions to which they
are allocable. The activities chargeable to F&A cost categories or the
major functions of the institution for employees whose salaries must be
apportioned (see subsection b.(1)b)), if not initially identified as
separate categories, may be subsequently distributed by any reasonable
method mutually agreed to, including, but not limited to, suitably
conducted surveys, statistical sampling procedures, or the application
of negotiated fixed rates.
(d) Practices vary among institutions and within institutions as to the
activity constituting a full workload. Therefore, the payroll
distribution system may reflect categories of activities expressed as a
percentage distribution of total activities.
(e) Direct and F&A charges may be made initially to sponsored agreements
on the basis of estimates made before services are performed. When such
estimates are used, significant changes in the corresponding work
activity must be identified and entered into the payroll distribution
system. Short term (such as one or two months) fluctuation between
workload categories need not be considered as long as the distribution
of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term, such as an
academic period.
(f) The system will provide for independent internal evaluations to
ensure the system's effectiveness and compliance with the above
standards.
(g) For systems which meet these standards, the institution will not be
required to provide additional support or documentation for the effort
actually performed.
-
Examples of
Acceptable Methods for Payroll Distribution:
(1) Plan Confirmation: Under this method, the distribution of salaries
and wages of professorial and professional staff applicable to
sponsored agreements is based on budgeted, planned, or assigned work
activity, updated to reflect any significant changes in work
distribution. A plan confirmation system used for salaries and wages
charged directly or indirectly to sponsored agreements will meet the
following standards:
(a) A system of budgeted, planned, or assigned work activity will
be incorporated into the official records of the institution and
encompass both sponsored and all other activities on an integrated
basis. The system may include the use of subsidiary records.
(b) The system will reasonably reflect only the activity for which the
employee is compensated by the institution (compensation for incidental
work described in subsection a need not be included). Practices vary
among institutions and within institutions as to the activity
constituting a full workload. Hence, the system will reflect categories
of activities expressed as a percentage distribution of total
activities. (See Section H for treatment of F&A costs under the
simplified method for small institutions.)
(c) The system will reflect activity applicable to each sponsored
agreement and to each category needed to identify F&A costs and the
functions to which they are allocable. The system may treat F&A cost
activities initially within a residual category and subsequently
determine them by alternate methods as discussed in subsection b.(2)(c).
(d) The system will provide for modification of an individual's salary
or salary distribution commensurate with a significant change in the
employee's work activity. Short term (such as one or two months)
fluctuation between workload categories need not be considered as long
as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer
term, such as an academic period. Whenever it is apparent that a
significant change in work activity that is directly or indirectly
charged to sponsored agreements will occur or has occurred, the change
will be documented over the signature of a responsible official and
entered into the system.
(e) At least annually a statement will be signed by the employee,
principal investigator, or responsible official(s) using suitable means
of verification that the work was performed, stating that salaries and
wages charged to sponsored agreements as direct charges, and to
residual, F&A cost or other categories are reasonable in relation to
work performed.
(f) The system will provide for independent internal evaluation to
ensure the system's integrity and compliance with the above standards.
(g) In the use of this method, an institution shall not be required to
provide additional support or documentation for the effort actually
performed.
(2) After the fact Activity Records: Under this system the distribution
of salaries and wages by the institution will be supported by activity
reports as prescribed below.
(a) Activity reports will reflect the distribution of activity
expended by employees covered by the system (compensation for incidental
work as described in subsection a need not be included).
(b) These reports will reflect an after the fact reporting of the
percentage distribution of activity of employees. Charges may be made
initially on the basis of estimates made before the services are
performed, provided that such charges are promptly adjusted if
significant differences are indicated by activity records.
(c) Reports will reasonably reflect the activities for which employees
are compensated by the institution. To confirm that the distribution of
activity represents a reasonable estimate of the work performed by the
employee during the period, the reports will be signed by the employee,
principal investigator, or responsible official(s) using suitable means
of verification that the work was performed.
(d) The system will reflect activity applicable to each sponsored
agreement and to each category needed to identify F&A costs and the
functions to which they are allocable. The system may treat F&A cost
activities initially within a residual category and subsequently
determine them by alternate methods as discussed in subsection b.(2)(c).
(e) For professorial and professional staff, the reports will be
prepared each academic term, but no less frequently than every six
months. For other employees, unless alternate arrangements are agreed
to, the reports will be prepared no less frequently than monthly and
will coincide with one or more pay periods.
(f) Where the institution uses time cards or other forms of after the
fact payroll documents as original documentation for payroll and payroll
charges, such documents shall qualify as records for this purpose,
provided that they meet the requirements in subsections (a) through (e).
(3) Multiple Confirmation Records: Under this system, the distribution
of salaries and wages of professorial and professional staff will be
supported by records which certify separately for direct and F&A cost
activities as prescribed below.
(a) For employees covered by the system, there will be direct cost
records to reflect the distribution of that activity expended which is
to be allocable as direct cost to each sponsored agreement. There will
also be F&A cost records to reflect the distribution of that activity to
F&A costs. These records may be kept jointly or separately (but are to
be certified separately, see below).
(b) Salary and wage charges may be made initially on the basis of
estimates made before the services are performed, provided that such
charges are promptly adjusted if significant differences occur.
(c) Institutional records will reasonably reflect only the activity for
which employees are compensated by the institution (compensation for
incidental work as described in subsection a need not be included).
(d) The system will reflect activity applicable to each sponsored
agreement and to each category needed to identify F&A costs and the
functions to which they are allocable.
(e) To confirm that distribution of activity represents a reasonable
estimate of the work performed by the employee during the period, the
record for each employee will include:
(1) the signature of the employee or of a person having direct
knowledge of the work, confirming that the record of activities
allocable as direct costs of each sponsored agreement is appropriate;
and,
(2) the record of F&A costs will include the signature of responsible
person(s) who use suitable means of verification that the work was
performed and is consistent with the overall distribution of the
employee's compensated activities. These signatures may all be on the
same document.
(f) The reports will be prepared each academic term, but no less
frequently than every six months.
(g) Where the institution uses time cards or other forms of after the
fact payroll documents as original documentation for payroll and payroll
charges, such documents shall qualify as records for this purposes,
provided they meet the requirements in subsections (a) through (f).
-
Salary rates for
faculty members.
(1) Salary rates for academic year. Charges for work performed on
sponsored agreements by faculty members during the academic year will
be based on the individual faculty member's regular compensation for
the continuous period which, under the policy of the institution
concerned, constitutes the basis of his salary. Charges for work
performed on sponsored agreements during all or any portion of such
period are allowable at the base salary rate. In no event will charges
to sponsored agreements, irrespective of the basis of computation,
exceed the proportionate share of the base salary for that period.
This principle applies to all members of the faculty at an
institution. Since intra university consulting is assumed to be
undertaken as a university obligation requiring no compensation in
addition to full time base salary, the principle also applies to
faculty members who function as consultants or otherwise contribute to
a sponsored agreement conducted by another faculty member of the same
institution. However, in unusual cases where consultation is across
departmental lines or involves a separate or remote operation, and the
work performed by the consultant is in addition to his regular
departmental load, any charges for such work representing extra
compensation above the base salary are allowable provided that such
consulting arrangements are specifically provided for in the agreement
or approved in writing by the sponsoring agency.
(2) Periods outside the academic year.
(a) Except as otherwise specified for teaching activity in subsection
(b), charges for work performed by faculty members on sponsored
agreements during the summer months or other period not included in
the base salary period will be determined for each faculty member at a
rate not in excess of the base salary divided by the period to which
the base salary relates, and will be limited to charges made in
accordance with other parts of this section. The base salary period
used in computing charges for work performed during the summer months
will be the number of months covered by the faculty member's official
academic year appointment.
(b) Charges for teaching activities performed by faculty members on
sponsored agreements during the summer months or other periods not
included in the base salary period will be based on the normal policy
of the institution governing compensation to faculty members for
teaching assignments during such periods.
(3) Part time faculty. Charges for work performed on sponsored
agreements by faculty members having only part time appointments will
be determined at a rate not in excess of that regularly paid for the
part time assignments. For example, an institution pays $5000 to a
faculty member for half time teaching during the academic year. He
devoted one half of his remaining time to a sponsored agreement. Thus,
his additional compensation, chargeable by the institution to the
agreement, would be one half of $5000, or $2500.
-
Noninstitutional
professional activities. Unless an arrangement is specifically
authorized by a Federal sponsoring agency, an institution must follow
its institution wide policies and practices concerning the permissible
extent of professional services that can be provided outside the
institution for noninstitutional compensation. Where such institution
wide policies do not exist or do not adequately define the permissible
extent of consulting or other noninstitutional activities undertaken
for extra outside pay, the Federal Government may require that the
effort of professional staff working on sponsored agreements be
allocated between (1) institutional activities, and (2)
noninstitutional professional activities. If the sponsoring agency
considers the extent of noninstitutional professional effort
excessive, appropriate arrangements governing compensation will be
negotiated on a case by case basis.
-
Fringe benefits.
(1) Fringe benefits in the form of regular compensation paid to
employees during periods of authorized absences from the job, such as
for annual leave, sick leave, military leave, and the like, are
allowable, provided such costs are distributed to all institutional
activities in proportion to the relative amount of time or effort
actually devoted by the employees. See subsection 11.f.(4) for
treatment of sabbatical leave.
(2) Fringe benefits in the form of employer contributions or expenses
for social security, employee insurance, workmen's compensation
insurance, tuition or remission of tuition for individual employees
are allowable, provided such benefits are granted in accordance with
established educational institutional policies, and are distributed to
all institutional activities on an equitable basis. Tuition benefits
for family members other than the employee are unallowable for fiscal
years beginning after September 30, 1998. See Section J.45.b,
Scholarships and student aid costs, for treatment of tuition remission
provided to students.
(3) Rules for pension plan costs are as follows:
(a) Costs of the institution's pension plan which are incurred in
accordance with the established policies of the institution are
allowable, provided: (i) such policies meet the test of
reasonableness, (ii) the methods of cost allocation are equitable for
all activities, (iii) the amount of pension cost assigned to each
fiscal year is determined in accordance with subsection (b), and (iv)
the cost assigned to a given fiscal year is paid or funded for all
plan participants within six months after the end of that year.
However, increases to normal and past service pension costs caused by
a delay in funding the actuarial liability beyond 30 days after each
quarter of the year to which such costs are assignable are
unallowable.
(b) The amount of pension cost assigned to each fiscal year shall be
determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. Institutions may elect to follow the "Cost Accounting
Standard for Composition and Measurement of Pension Cost" (48 Part
9904 412).
(c) Premiums paid for pension plan termination insurance pursuant to
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 (Pub. L.
93 406) are allowable. Late payment charges on such premiums are
unallowable. Excise taxes on accumulated funding deficiencies and
prohibited transactions of pension plan fiduciaries imposed under
ERISA are also unallowable.
(4) Rules for sabbatical leave are as follows:
(a) Costs of leave of absence by employees for performance of graduate
work or sabbatical study, travel, or research are allowable provided
the institution has a uniform policy on sabbatical leave for persons
engaged in instruction and persons engaged in research. Such costs
will be allocated on an equitable basis among all related activities
of the institution.
(b) Where sabbatical leave is included in fringe benefits for which a
cost is determined for assessment as a direct charge, the aggregate
amount of such assessments applicable to all work of the institution
during the base period must be reasonable in relation to the
institution's actual experience under its sabbatical leave policy.
(5) Fringe benefits may be assigned to cost objectives by identifying
specific benefits to specific individual employees or by allocating on
the basis of institution wide salaries and wages of the employees
receiving the benefits. When the allocation method is used, separate
allocations must be made to selective groupings of employees, unless
the institution demonstrates that costs in relationship to salaries
and wages do not differ significantly for different groups of
employees. Fringe benefits shall be treated in the same manner as the
salaries and wages of the employees receiving the benefits. The
benefits related to salaries and wages treated as direct costs shall
also be treated as direct costs; the benefits related to salaries and
wages treated as F&A costs shall be treated as F&A costs.
-
Institution
furnished automobiles.
That portion of the cost of institution furnished automobiles that
relates to personal use by employees (including transportation to and
from work) is unallowable regardless of whether the cost is reported
as taxable income to the employees.
-
Severance pay.
(1) Severance pay is compensation in addition to regular salary and
wages which is paid by an institution to employees whose services are
being terminated. Costs of severance pay are allowable only to the
extent that such payments are required by law, by employer-employee
agreement, by established policy that constitutes in effect an implied
agreement on the institution's part, or by circumstances of the
particular employment.
(2) Severance payments that are due to normal recurring turnover and
which otherwise meet the conditions of subsection (1) may be allowed
provided the actual costs of such severance payments are regarded as
expenses applicable to the current fiscal year and are equitably
distributed among the institution's activities during that period.
(3) Severance payments that are due to abnormal or mass terminations
are of such conjectural nature that allowability must be determined on
a case-by-case basis. However, the Federal Government recognizes its
obligation to participate, to the extent of its fair share, in any
specific payment.
(4) Costs incurred in excess of the institution's normal severance pay
policy applicable to all persons employed by the institution upon
termination of employment are unallowable.
11.
Contingency provisions.
Contributions to a contingency reserve or any similar provision made for
events the occurrence of which cannot be foretold with certainty as to
time, intensity, or with an assurance of their happening, are
unallowable, except as noted in the cost principles in this circular
regarding self-insurance, pensions, severance and post-retirement health
costs.
12.
Deans of faculty and graduate schools.
The
salaries and expenses of deans of faculty and graduate schools, or their
equivalents, and their staffs, are allowable.
13.
Defense and prosecution of criminal and civil
proceedings, claims, appeals and patent infringement.
-
Definitions.
"Conviction," as used herein, means a judgment or conviction of a
criminal offense by any court of competent jurisdiction, whether
entered upon verdict or a plea, including a conviction due to a plea
of nolo contendere.
"Costs," include, but are not limited to, administrative and clerical
expenses; the cost of legal services, whether performed by in house or
private counsel; the costs of the services of accountants,
consultants, or others retained by the institution to assist it; costs
of employees, officers and trustees, and any similar costs incurred
before, during, and after commencement of a judicial or administrative
proceeding that bears a direct relationship to the proceedings.
"Fraud," as used herein, means –
(1) acts of fraud or corruption or attempts to defraud the Federal
Government or to corrupt its agents;
(2) acts that constitute a cause for debarment or suspension (as
specified in agency regulations), and (3) acts which violate the False
Claims Act, 31 U.S.C., sections 3729 3731, or the Anti kickback Act,
41 U.S.C., sections 51 and 54.
"Penalty," does not include restitution, reimbursement, or
compensatory damages.
"Proceeding," includes an investigation.
-
(1) Except as
otherwise described herein, costs incurred in connection with any
criminal, civil or administrative proceeding (including filing of a
false certification) commenced by the Federal Government, or a State,
local or foreign government, are not allowable if the proceeding
(a) relates to a violation of, or failure to comply with, a Federal,
State, local or foreign statute or regulation, by the institution
(including its agents and employees); and
(b) results in any of the following dispositions:
(i) In a criminal proceeding, a conviction.
(ii) In a civil or administrative proceeding involving an allegation of
fraud or similar misconduct, a determination of institutional liability.
(iii) In the case of any civil or administrative proceeding, the
imposition of a monetary penalty.
(iv) A final decision by an appropriate Federal official to debar or
suspend the institution, to rescind or void an award, or to terminate an
award for default by reason of a violation or failure to comply with a
law or regulation.
(v) A disposition by consent or compromise, if the action could have
resulted in any of the dispositions described in subsections (i) through
(iv).
(2) If
more than one proceeding involves the same alleged misconduct, the costs
of all such proceedings shall be unallowable if any one of them results
in one of the dispositions shown in subsection b.
-
If a proceeding
referred to in subsection b. is commenced by the Federal Government
and is resolved by consent or compromise pursuant to an agreement
entered into by the institution and the Federal Government, then the
costs incurred by the institution in connection with such proceedings
that are otherwise not allowable under subsection b. may be allowed to
the extent specifically provided in such agreement.
-
If a proceeding
referred to in subsection b. is commenced by a State, local or foreign
government, the authorized Federal official may allow the costs
incurred by the institution for such proceedings, if such authorized
official determines that the costs were incurred as a result of –
(1) a specific term or condition of a federally sponsored agreement;
or
(2) specific written direction of an authorized official of the
sponsoring agency.
-
Costs incurred in
connection with proceedings described in subsection b, but which are
not made unallowable by that subsection, may be allowed by the Federal
Government, but only to the extent that:
(1) The costs are reasonable in relation to the activities required to
deal with the proceeding and the underlying cause of action;
(2) Payment of the costs incurred, as allowable and allocable costs,
is not prohibited by any other provision(s) of the sponsored
agreement;
(3) The costs are not otherwise recovered from the Federal Government
or a third party, either directly as a result of the proceeding or
otherwise; and,
(4) The percentage of costs allowed does not exceed the percentage
determined by an authorized Federal official to be appropriate
considering the complexity of procurement litigation, generally
accepted principles governing the award of legal fees in civil actions
involving the United States as a party, and such other factors as may
be appropriate. Such percentage shall not exceed 80 percent. However,
if an agreement reached under subsection c has explicitly considered
this 80 percent limitation and permitted a higher percentage, then the
full amount of costs resulting from that agreement shall be allowable.
-
Costs incurred by
the institution in connection with the defense of suits brought by its
employees or ex employees under section 2 of the Major Fraud Act of
1988 (Pub. L. 100 700), including the cost of all relief necessary to
make such employee whole, where the institution was found liable or
settled, are unallowable.
-
Costs of legal,
accounting, and consultant services, and related costs, incurred in
connection with defense against Federal Government claims or appeals,
or the prosecution of claims or appeals against the Federal
Government, are unallowable.
-
Costs of legal,
accounting, and consultant services, and related costs, incurred in
connection with patent infringement litigation, are unallowable unless
otherwise provided for in the sponsored agreements.
-
Costs, which may be
unallowable under this section, including directly associated costs,
shall be segregated and accounted for by the institution separately.
During the pendency of any proceeding covered by subsections b and f,
the Federal Government shall generally withhold payment of such costs.
However, if in the best interests of the Federal Government, the
Federal Government may provide for conditional payment upon provision
of adequate security, or other adequate assurance, and agreement by
the institution to repay all unallowable costs, plus interest, if the
costs are subsequently determined to be unallowable.
14.
Depreciation and use allowances.
-
Institutions may be
compensated for the use of their buildings, capital improvements, and
equipment, provided that they are used, needed in the institutions'
activities, and properly allocable to sponsored agreements. Such
compensation shall be made by computing either depreciation or use
allowance. Use allowances are the means of providing such compensation
when depreciation or other equivalent costs are not computed. The
allocation for depreciation or use allowance shall be made in
accordance with Section F.2. Depreciation and use allowances are
computed applying the following rules:
-
The computation of
depreciation or use allowances shall be based on the acquisition cost
of the assets involved. The acquisition cost of an asset donated to
the institution by a third party shall be its fair market value at the
time of the donation.
-
For this purpose,
the acquisition cost will exclude:
(1) the cost of land;
(2) any portion of the cost of buildings and equipment borne by or
donated by the Federal Government, irrespective of where title was
originally vested or where it is presently located; and
(3) any portion of the cost of buildings and equipment contributed by
or for the institution where law or agreement prohibits recovery.
-
In the use of the
depreciation method, the following shall be observed:
(1) The period of useful service (useful life) established in each
case for usable capital assets must take into consideration such
factors as type of construction, nature of the equipment,
technological developments in the particular area, and the renewal and
replacement policies followed for the individual items or classes of
assets involved.
(2) The depreciation method used to charge the cost of an asset (or
group of assets) to accounting periods shall reflect the pattern of
consumption of the asset during its useful life.
In the absence of clear evidence indicating that the expected
consumption of the asset will be significantly greater in the early
portions than in the later portions of its useful life, the
straight-line method shall be presumed to be the appropriate method.
Depreciation methods once used shall not be changed unless approved in
advance by the cognizant Federal agency. The depreciation methods used
to calculate the depreciation amounts for F&A rate purposes shall be
the same methods used by the institution for its financial statements.
This requirement does not apply to those institutions (e.g., public
institutions of higher education) which are not required to record
depreciation by applicable generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
(3) Where the depreciation method is introduced to replace the use
allowance method, depreciation shall be computed as if the asset had
been depreciated over its entire life (i.e., from the date the asset
was acquired and ready for use to the date of disposal or withdrawal
from service). The aggregate amount of use allowances and depreciation
attributable to an asset (including imputed depreciation applicable to
periods prior to the conversion to the use allowance method as well as
depreciation after the conversion) may be less than, and in no case,
greater than the total acquisition cost of the asset.
(4) The entire building, including the shell and all components, may
be treated as a single asset and depreciated over a single useful
life. A building may also be divided into multiple components. Each
component item may then be depreciated over its estimated useful life.
The building components shall be grouped into three general components
of a building: building shell (including construction and design
costs), building services systems (e.g., elevators, HVAC, plumbing
system and heating and air-conditioning system) and fixed equipment
(e.g., sterilizers, casework, fume hoods, cold rooms and
glassware/washers). In exceptional cases, a Federal cognizant agency
may authorize a institution to use more than these three groupings.
When a institution elects to depreciate its buildings by its
components, the same depreciation methods must be used for F&A
purposes and financial statement purposes, as described in subsection
d.2.
(5) Where the depreciation method is used for a particular class of
assets, no depreciation may be allowed on any such assets that have
outlived their depreciable lives. (See also subsection e.(3))
-
Under the use
allowance method, the following shall be observed:
(1) The use allowance for buildings and improvements (including
improvements such as paved parking areas, fences, and sidewalks) shall
be computed at an annual rate not exceeding two percent of acquisition
cost.
The use allowance for equipment shall be computed at an annual rate
not exceeding six and two-thirds percent of acquisition cost. Use
allowance recovery is limited to the acquisition cost of the assets.
For donated assets, use allowance recovery is limited to the fair
market value of the assets at the time of donation.
(2) In contrast to the depreciation method, the entire building must
be treated as a single asset without separating its "shell" from other
building components under the use allowance method. The entire
building must be treated as a single asset, and the two-percent use
allowance limitation must be applied to all parts of the building.
The two-percent limitation, however, need not be applied to equipment
or other assets that are merely attached or fastened to the building
but not permanently fixed and are used as furnishings, decorations or
for specialized purposes (e.g., dentist chairs and dental treatment
units, counters, laboratory benches bolted to the floor, dishwashers,
modular furniture, and carpeting). Such equipment and assets will be
considered as not being permanently fixed to the building if they can
be removed without the need for costly or extensive alterations or
repairs to the building to make the space usable for other purposes.
Equipment and assets that meet these criteria will be subject to the 6
2/3 percent equipment use allowance.
(3) A reasonable use allowance may be negotiated for any assets that
are considered to be fully depreciated, after taking into
consideration the amount of depreciation previously charged to the
Federal Government, the estimated useful life remaining at the time of
negotiation, the effect of any increased maintenance charges,
decreased efficiency due to age, and any other factors pertinent to
the utilization of the asset for the purpose contemplated.
(4) Notwithstanding subsection e.(3), once a institution converts from
one cost recovery methodology to another, acquisition costs not
recovered may not be used in the calculation of the use allowance in
subsection e.(3).
-
Except as otherwise
provided in subsections b. through e., a combination of the
depreciation and use allowance methods may not be used, in like
circumstances, for a single class of assets (e.g., buildings, office
equipment, and computer equipment).
-
Charges for use
allowances or depreciation must be supported by adequate property
records, and physical inventories must be taken at least once every
two years to ensure that the assets exist and are usable, used, and
needed. Statistical sampling techniques may be used in taking these
inventories. In addition, when the depreciation method is used,
adequate depreciation records showing the amount of depreciation taken
each period must also be maintained.
-
This section applies to the largest college and
university recipients of Federal research and development funds as
displayed in Exhibit A, List of Colleges and Universities Subject to
Section J.14.h of Circular A-21.
(1) Institutions shall expend currently, or reserve for expenditure
within the next five years, the portion of F&A cost payments made for
depreciation or use allowances under sponsored research agreements,
consistent with Section F.2, to acquire or improve research
facilities. This provision applies only to Federal agreements, which
reimburse F&A costs at a full negotiated rate. These funds may only be
used for (a) liquidation of the principal of debts incurred to acquire
assets that are used directly for organized research activities, or
(b) payments to acquire, repair, renovate, or improve buildings or
equipment directly used for organized research. For buildings or
equipment not exclusively used for organized research activity, only
appropriately proportionate amounts will be considered to have been
expended for research facilities.
(2) An assurance that an amount equal to the Federal reimbursements
has been appropriately expended or reserved to acquire or improve
research facilities shall be submitted as part of each F&A cost
proposal submitted to the cognizant Federal agency which is based on
costs incurred on or after October 1, 1991. This assurance will cover
the cumulative amounts of funds received and expended during the
period beginning after the period covered by the previous assurance
and ending with the fiscal year on which the proposal is based. The
assurance shall also cover any amounts reserved from a prior period in
which the funds received exceeded the amounts expended.
15.
Donations and contributions.
-
Contributions or
Donations rendered.
Contributions or donations, including cash, property, and services,
made by the institution, regardless of the recipient, are unallowable.
-
Donated services
received.
Donated or volunteer services may be furnished to a institution by
professional and technical personnel, consultants, and other skilled
and unskilled labor. The value of these services is not reimbursable
either as a direct or F&A cost. However, the value of donated services
may be used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements in
accordance with Circular A-110.
-
Donated property.
The value of donated property is not reimbursable either as a direct
or F&A cost, except that depreciation or use allowances on donated
assets are permitted in accordance with Section J.14. The value of
donated property may be used to meet cost sharing or matching
requirements, in accordance with Circular A-110.
16.
Employee morale, health, and welfare costs and costs.
-
The costs of
employee information publications, health or first-aid clinics and/or
infirmaries, recreational activities, employee counseling services,
and any other expenses incurred in accordance with the institution's
established practice or custom for the improvement of working
conditions, employer-employee relations, employee morale, and employee
performance are allowable.
-
Such costs will be
equitably apportioned to all activities of the institution. Income
generated from any of these activities will be credited to the cost
thereof unless such income has been irrevocably set over to employee
welfare organizations.
-
Losses resulting
from operating food services are allowable only if the institution’s
objective is to operate such services on a break-even basis. Losses
sustained because of operating objectives other than the above are
allowable only (a) where the institution can demonstrate unusual
circumstances, and (b) with the approval of the cognizant Federal
agency.
17.
Entertainment costs.
Costs of
entertainment, including amusement, diversion, and social activities and
any costs directly associated with such costs (such as tickets to shows
or sports events, meals, lodging, rentals, transportation, and
gratuities) are unallowable.
18.
Equipment and other capital expenditures.
-
For purposes of
this subsection, the following definitions apply:
(1) "Capital Expenditures” means expenditures for the acquisition cost
of capital assets (equipment, buildings, and land), or expenditures to
make improvements to capital assets that materially increase their
value or useful life. Acquisition cost means the cost of the asset
including the cost to put it in place. Acquisition cost for equipment,
for example, means the net invoice price of the equipment, including
the cost of any modifications, attachments, accessories, or auxiliary
apparatus necessary to make it usable for the purpose for which it is
acquired. Ancillary charges, such as taxes, duty, protective in
transit insurance, freight, and installation may be included in, or
excluded from the acquisition cost in accordance with the
institution's regular accounting practices.
(2) "Equipment" means an article of nonexpendable, tangible personal
property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition
cost which equals or exceeds the lesser of the capitalization level
established by the institution for financial statement purposes, or
$5000.
(3) "Special purpose equipment" means equipment which is used only for
research, medical, scientific, or other technical activities. Examples
of special purpose equipment include microscopes, x-ray machines,
surgical instruments, and spectrometers.
(4) "General purpose equipment" means equipment, which is not limited
to research, medical, scientific or other technical activities.
Examples include office equipment and furnishings, modular offices,
telephone networks, information technology equipment and systems, air
conditioning equipment, reproduction and printing equipment, and motor
vehicles.
-
The following rules of allowability shall apply
to equipment and other capital expenditures:
(1) Capital expenditures for general purpose equipment, buildings, and
land are unallowable as direct charges, except where approved in
advance by the awarding agency.
(2) Capital expenditures for special purpose equipment are allowable
as direct costs, provided that items with a unit cost of $5000 or more
have the prior approval of the awarding agency.
(3) Capital expenditures for improvements to land, buildings, or
equipment which materially increase their value or useful life are
unallowable as a direct cost except with the prior approval of the
awarding agency.
(4) When approved as a direct charge pursuant to subsections J.18.b(1)
through (3)above, capital expenditures will be charged in the period
in which the expenditure is incurred, or as otherwise determined
appropriate by and negotiated with the awarding agency.
(5) Equipment and other capital expenditures are unallowable as
indirect costs. However, see section J.14, Depreciation and use
allowances, for rules on the allowability of use allowances or
depreciation on buildings, capital improvements, and equipment. Also,
see section J.43, Rental costs of buildings and equipment, for rules
on the allowability of rental costs for land, buildings, and
equipment.
(6) The unamortized portion of any equipment written off as a result
of a change in capitalization levels may be recovered by continuing to
claim the otherwise allowable use allowances or depreciation on the
equipment, or by amortizing the amount to be written off over a period
of years negotiated with the cognizant agency.
19.
Fines and penalties.
Costs
resulting from violations of, or failure of the institution to comply
with, Federal, State, and local or foreign laws and regulations are
unallowable, except when incurred as a result of compliance with
specific provisions of the sponsored agreement, or instructions in
writing from the authorized official of the sponsoring agency
authorizing in advance such payments.
20.
Fund raising and investment costs.
-
Costs of organized
fund raising, including financial campaigns, endowment drives,
solicitation of gifts and bequests, and similar expenses incurred
solely to raise capital or obtain contributions, are unallowable.
-
Costs of investment
counsel and staff and similar expenses incurred solely to enhance
income form investments are unallowable.
-
Costs related to
the physical custody and control of monies and securities are
allowable.
21.
Gain and losses on depreciable assets.
-
(1) Gains and
losses on the sale, retirement, or other disposition of depreciable
property shall be included in the year in which they occur as credits
or charges to the asset cost grouping(s) in which the property was
included. The amount of the gain or loss to be included as a credit or
charge to the appropriate asset cost grouping(s) shall be the
difference between the amount realized on the property and the
undepreciated basis of the property.
(2) Gains and losses on the disposition of depreciable property shall
not be recognized as a separate credit or charge under the following
conditions:
(a) The gain or loss is processed through a depreciation account
and is reflected in the depreciation allowable under Section J.14.
(b) The property is given in exchange as part of the purchase price of a
similar item and the gain or loss is taken into account in determining
the depreciation cost basis of the new item.
(c) A loss results from the failure to maintain permissible insurance,
except as otherwise provided in Section J.25.
(d) Compensation for the use of the property was provided through use
allowances in lieu of depreciation.
-
Gains or losses of
any nature arising from the sale or exchange of property other than
the property covered in subsection a shall be excluded in computing
sponsored agreement costs.
-
When assets
acquired with Federal funds, in part or wholly, are disposed of, the
distribution of the proceeds shall be made in accordance with Circular
A 110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements
with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non Profit
Organizations."
22.
Goods or services for personal use.
Costs of
goods or services for personal use of the institution's employees are
unallowable regardless of whether the cost is reported as taxable income
to the employees.
23.
Housing and personal living expenses.
-
Costs of housing
(e.g., depreciation, maintenance, utilities, furnishings, rent, etc.),
housing allowances and personal living expenses for/of the
institution's officers are unallowable regardless of whether the cost
is reported as taxable income to the employees.
-
The term "officers" includes current and past
officers.
24.
Idle facilities and idle capacity.
-
As used in this
section the following terms have the meanings set forth below:
(1) "Facilities" means land and buildings or any portion thereof,
equipment individually or collectively, or any other tangible capital
asset, wherever located, and whether owned or leased by the
institution.
(2) "Idle facilities" means completely unused facilities that are
excess to the institution's current needs.
(3) "Idle capacity" means the unused capacity of partially used
facilities. It is the difference between:
(a) that which a facility could achieve under 100 percent operating
time on a one-shift basis less operating interruptions resulting from
time lost for repairs, setups, unsatisfactory materials, and other
normal delays; and
(b) the extent to which the facility was actually used to meet demands
during the accounting period. A multi-shift basis should be used if it
can be shown that this amount of usage would normally be expected for
the type of facility involved.
(4) "Cost of idle facilities or idle capacity" means costs such as
maintenance, repair, housing, rent, and other related costs, e.g.,
insurance, interest, property taxes and depreciation or use allowances.
-
The costs of idle
facilities are unallowable except to the extent that:
(1) They are necessary to meet fluctuations in workload; or
(2) Although not necessary to meet fluctuations in workload, they were
necessary when acquired and are now idle because of changes in program
requirements, efforts to achieve more economical operations,
reorganization, termination, or other causes which could not have been
reasonably foreseen. Under the exception stated in this subsection,
costs of idle facilities are allowable for a reasonable period of
time, ordinarily not to exceed one year, depending on the initiative
taken to use, lease, or dispose of such facilities.
-
The costs of idle
capacity are normal costs of doing business and are a factor in the
normal fluctuations of usage or indirect cost rates from period to
period. Such costs are allowable, provided that the capacity is
reasonably anticipated to be necessary or was originally reasonable
and is not subject to reduction or elimination by use on other
sponsored agreements, subletting, renting, or sale, in accordance with
sound business, economic, or security practices. Widespread idle
capacity throughout an entire facility or among a group of assets
having substantially the same function may be considered idle
facilities.
25.
Insurance and indemnification.
-
Costs of insurance
required or approved, and maintained, pursuant to the sponsored
agreement, are allowable.
-
Costs of other
insurance maintained by the institution in connection with the general
conduct of its activities, are allowable subject to the following
limitations:
(1) types and extent and cost of coverage must be in accordance with
sound institutional practice;
(2) costs of insurance or of any contributions to any reserve covering
the risk of loss of or damage to federally owned property are
unallowable, except to the extent that the Federal Government has
specifically required or approved such costs; and
(3) costs of insurance on the lives of officers or trustees are
unallowable except where such insurance is part of an employee plan
which is not unduly restricted.
-
Contributions to a
reserve for a self insurance program are allowable, to the extent that
the types of coverage, extent of coverage, and the rates and premiums
would have been allowed had insurance been purchased to cover the
risks.
-
Actual losses which
could have been covered by permissible insurance (whether through
purchased insurance or self insurance) are unallowable, unless
expressly provided for in the sponsored agreement, except that costs
incurred because of losses not covered under existing deductible
clauses for insurance coverage provided in keeping with sound
management practice as well as minor losses not covered by insurance,
such as spoilage, breakage and disappearance of small hand tools,
which occur in the ordinary course of operations, are allowable.
-
Indemnification
includes securing the institution against liabilities to third persons
and other losses not compensated by insurance or otherwise. The
Federal Government is obligated to indemnify the institution only to
the extent expressly provided for in the sponsored agreement, except
as provided in subsection d.
-
Insurance against
defects. Costs of insurance with respect to any costs incurred to
correct defects in the institution's materials or workmanship are
unallowable.
-
Medical liability
(malpractice) insurance is an allowable cost of research programs only
to the extent that the research involves human subjects. Medical
liability insurance costs shall be treated as a direct cost and shall
be assigned to individual projects based on the manner in which the
insurer allocates the risk to the population covered by the insurance.
26.
Interest.
-
Costs incurred for
interest on borrowed capital, temporary use of endowment funds, or the
use of the institution’s own funds, however represented, are
unallowable. However, interest on debt incurred after July 1, 1982 to
acquire buildings, major reconstruction and remodeling, or the
acquisition or fabrication of capital equipment costing $10,000 or
more, is allowable.
-
Interest on debt
incurred after May 8, 1996 to acquire or replace capital assets
(including construction, renovations, alterations, equipment, land,
and capital assets acquired through capital leases) acquired after
that date and used in support of sponsored agreements is allowable,
subject to the following conditions:
(1) For facilities costing over $500,000, the institution shall
prepare, prior to acquisition or replacement of the facility, a
lease-purchase analysis in accordance with the provisions of Sec___.30
through____.37 of OMB Circular A-110, which shows that a financed
purchase, including a capital lease is less costly to the institution
than other operating lease alternatives, on a net present value basis.
Discount rates used shall be equal to the institution's anticipated
interest rates and shall be no higher than the fair market rate
available to the institution from an unrelated ("arm's length")
third-party. The lease-purchase analysis shall include a comparison of
the net present value of the projected total cost comparisons of both
alternatives over the period the asset is expected to be used by the
institution. The cost comparisons associated with purchasing the
facility shall include the estimated purchase price, anticipated
operating and maintenance costs (including property taxes, if
applicable) not included in the debt financing, less any estimated
asset salvage value at the end of the defined period. The cost
comparison for a capital lease shall include the estimated total lease
payments, any estimated bargain purchase option, operating and
maintenance costs, and taxes not included in the capital leasing
arrangement, less any estimated credits due under the lease at the end
of the defined period. Projected operating lease costs shall be based
on the anticipated cost of leasing comparable facilities at fair
market rates under rental agreements that would be renewed or
reestablished over the period defined above, and any expected
maintenance costs and allowable property taxes to be borne by the
institution directly or as part of the lease arrangement.
(2) The actual interest cost claimed is predicated upon interest rates
that are no higher than the fair market rate available to the
institution from an unrelated (arm's length) third party.
(3) Investment earnings, including interest income on bond or loan
principal, pending payment of the construction or acquisition costs,
are used to offset allowable interest cost. Arbitrage earnings
reportable to the Internal Revenue Service are not required to be
offset against allowable interest costs.
(4) Reimbursements are limited to the least costly alternative based
on the total cost analysis required under subsection (1). For example,
if an operating lease is determined to be less costly than purchasing
through debt financing, then reimbursement is limited to the amount
determined if leasing had been used. In all cases where a
lease-purchase analysis is required to be performed, Federal
reimbursement shall be based upon the least expensive alternative.
(5) For debt arrangements over $1 million, unless the institution
makes an initial equity contribution to the asset purchase of 25
percent or more, the institution shall reduce claims for interest
expense by an amount equal to imputed interest earnings on excess cash
flow, which is to be calculated as follows. Annually, non-Federal
entities shall prepare a cumulative (from the inception of the
project) report of monthly cash flows that includes inflows and
outflows, regardless of the funding source. Inflows consist of
depreciation expense, amortization of capitalized construction
interest, and annual interest cost. For cash flow calculations, the
annual inflow figures shall be divided by the number of months in the
year (i.e., usually 12) that the building is in service for monthly
amounts. Outflows consist of initial equity contributions, debt
principal payments (less the pro rata share attributable to the
unallowable costs of land) and interest payments. Where cumulative
inflows exceed cumulative outflows, interest shall be calculated on
the excess inflows for that period and be treated as a reduction to
allowable interest cost. The rate of interest to be used to compute
earnings on excess cash flows shall be the three-month Treasury bill
closing rate as of the last business day of that month.
(6) Substantial relocation of federally sponsored activities from a
facility financed by indebtedness, the cost of which was funded in
whole or part through Federal reimbursements, to another facility
prior to the expiration of a period of 20 years requires notice to the
cognizant agency. The extent of the relocation, the amount of the
Federal participation in the financing, and the depreciation and
interest charged to date may require negotiation and/or downward
adjustments of replacement space charged to Federal programs in the
future.
(7) The allowable costs to acquire facilities and equipment are
limited to a fair market value available to the institution from an
unrelated (arm's length) third party.
-
Institutions are
also subject to the following conditions:
(1) Interest on debt incurred to finance or refinance assets
re-acquired after the applicable effective dates stipulated above is
unallowable.
(2) Interest attributable to fully depreciated assets is unallowable.
-
The following
definitions are to be used for purposes of this section:
(1) “Re-acquired” assets means assets held by the institution prior to
the applicable effective dates stipulated above that have again come
to be held by the institution, whether through repurchase or
refinancing. It does not include assets acquired to replace older
assets.
(2) "Initial equity contribution" means the amount or value of
contributions made by non-Federal entities for the acquisition of the
asset prior to occupancy of facilities.
(3) "Asset costs" means the capitalizable costs of an asset, including
construction costs, acquisition costs, and other such costs
capitalized in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (GAAP).
27.
Labor relations costs.
Costs
incurred in maintaining satisfactory relations between the institution
and its employees, including costs of labor management committees,
employees' publications, and other related activities, are allowable.
28.
Lobbying.
Reference
is made to the common rule published at 55 FR 6736 (2/26/90), and OMB's
governmentwide guidance, amendments to OMB's governmentwide guidance,
and OMB's clarification notices published at 54 FR 52306 (12/20/89), 61
FR 1412 (1/19/96), 55 FR 24540 (6/15/90) and 57 FR 1772 (1/15/92),
respectively. In addition, the following restrictions shall apply:
-
Notwithstanding
other provisions of this Circular, costs associated with the following
activities are unallowable:
(1) Attempts to influence the outcomes of any Federal, State, or local
election, referendum, initiative, or similar procedure, through in
kind or cash contributions, endorsements, publicity, or similar
activity;
(2) Establishing, administering, contributing to, or paying the
expenses of a political party, campaign, political action committee,
or other organization established for the purpose of influencing the
outcomes of elections;
(3) Any attempt to influence –
(i) the introduction of Federal or State legislation;
(ii) the enactment or modification of any pending Federal or State
legislation through communication with any member or employee of the
Congress or State legislature, including efforts to influence State or
local officials to engage in similar lobbying activity; or
(iii) any government official or employee in connection with a decision
to sign or veto enrolled legislation;
(4) Any attempt to influence –
(i) the introduction of Federal or State legislation; or
(ii) the enactment or modification of any pending Federal or State
legislation by preparing, distributing, or using publicity or
propaganda, or by urging members of the general public, or any segment
thereof, to contribute to or participate in any mass demonstration,
march, rally, fund raising drive, lobbying campaign or letter writing or
telephone campaign; or
(5) Legislative liaison activities, including attendance at legislative
sessions or committee hearings, gathering information regarding
legislation, and analyzing the effect of legislation, when such
activities are carried on in support of or in knowing preparation for an
effort to engage in unallowable lobbying.
-
The following
activities are excepted from the coverage of subsection a:
(1) Technical and factual presentations on topics directly related to
the performance of a grant, contract, or other agreement (through
hearing testimony, statements, or letters to the Congress or a State
legislature, or subdivision, member, or cognizant staff member
thereof), in response to a documented request (including a
Congressional Record notice requesting testimony or statements for the
record at a regularly scheduled hearing) made by the recipient member,
legislative body or subdivision, or a cognizant staff member thereof,
provided such information is readily obtainable and can be readily put
in deliverable form, and further provided that costs under this
section for travel, lodging or meals are unallowable unless incurred
to offer testimony at a regularly scheduled Congressional hearing
pursuant to a written request for such presentation made by the
Chairman or Ranking Minority Member of the Committee or Subcommittee
conducting such hearings;
(2) Any lobbying made unallowable by subsection a.(3) to influence
State legislation in order to directly reduce the cost, or to avoid
material impairment of the institution's authority to perform the
grant, contract, or other agreement; or
(3) Any activity specifically authorized by statute to be undertaken
with funds from the grant, contract, or other agreement.
-
When an institution
seeks reimbursement for F&A costs, total lobbying costs shall be
separately identified in the F&A cost rate proposal, and thereafter
treated as other unallowable activity costs in accordance with the
procedures of Section B.1.d.
-
Institutions shall
submit as part of their annual F&A cost rate proposal a certification
that the requirements and standards of this section have been complied
with.
-
Institutions shall
maintain adequate records to demonstrate that the determination of
costs as being allowable or unallowable pursuant to this section
complies with the requirements of this Circular.
-
Time logs,
calendars, or similar records shall not be required to be created for
purposes of complying with this section during any particular calendar
month when:
(1) the employee engages in lobbying (as defined in subsections a and
b) 25 percent or less of the employee's compensated hours of
employment during that calendar month; and
(2) within the preceding five year period, the institution has not
materially misstated allowable or unallowable costs of any nature,
including legislative lobbying costs. When conditions (1) and (2) are
met, institutions are not required to establish records to support the
allowability of claimed costs in addition to records already required
or maintained. Also, when conditions (1) and (2) are met, the absence
of time logs, calendars, or similar records will not serve as a basis
for disallowing costs by contesting estimates of lobbying time spent
by employees during a calendar month.
-
Agencies shall
establish procedures for resolving in advance, in consultation with
OMB, any significant questions or disagreements concerning the
interpretation or application of this section. Any such advance
resolutions shall be binding in any subsequent settlements, audits, or
investigations with respect to that grant or contract for purposes of
interpretation of this Circular, provided, however, that this shall
not be construed to prevent a contractor or grantee from contesting
the lawfulness of such a determination.
-
Executive lobbying costs.
Costs incurred in attempting to improperly influence either directly
or indirectly, an employee or officer of the Executive Branch of the
Federal Government to give consideration or to act regarding a
sponsored agreement or a regulatory matter are unallowable. Improper
influence means any influence that induces or tends to induce a
Federal employee or officer to give consideration or to act regarding
a federally sponsored agreement or regulatory matter on any basis
other than the merits of the matter.
29.
Losses on other sponsored agreements or contracts.
Any
excess of costs over income under any other sponsored agreement or
contract of any nature is unallowable. This includes, but is not limited
to, the institution's contributed portion by reason of cost sharing
agreements or any under recoveries through negotiation of flat amounts
for F&A costs.
30.
Maintenance and repair costs.
Costs
incurred for necessary maintenance, repair, or upkeep of buildings and
equipment (including Federal property unless otherwise provided for)
which neither add to the permanent value of the property nor appreciably
prolong its intended life, but keep it in an efficient operating
condition, are allowable. Costs incurred for improvements which add to
the permanent value of the buildings and equipment or appreciably
prolong their intended life shall be treated as capital expenditures
(see section 18.a(1)).
31.
Material and supplies costs.
-
Costs incurred for
materials, supplies, and fabricated parts necessary to carry out a
sponsored agreement are allowable.
-
Purchased materials
and supplies shall be charged at their actual prices, net of
applicable credits. Withdrawals from general stores or stockrooms
should be charged at their actual net cost under any recognized method
of pricing inventory withdrawals, consistently applied. Incoming
transportation charges are a proper part of materials and supplies
costs.
-
Only materials and
supplies actually used for the performance of a sponsored agreement
may be charged as direct costs.
-
Where federally
donated or furnished materials are used in performing the sponsored
agreement, such materials will be used without charge.
32.
Meetings and Conferences.
Costs of
meetings and conferences, the primary purpose of which is the
dissemination of technical information, are allowable. This includes
costs of meals, transportation, rental of facilities, speakers' fees,
and other items incidental to such meetings or conferences. But see
section J.17, Entertainment costs.
33.
Memberships, subscriptions and professional activity
costs.
-
Costs of the
institution’s membership in business, technical, and professional
organizations are allowable.
-
Costs of the
institution’s subscriptions to business, professional, and technical
periodicals are allowable.
-
Costs of membership
in any civic or community organization are unallowable.
-
Costs of membership
in any country club or social or dining club or organization are
unallowable.
34.
Patent costs.
-
The following costs
relating to patent and copyright matters are allowable:
(1) cost of preparing disclosures, reports, and other documents
required by the sponsored agreement and of searching the art to the
extent necessary to make such disclosures;
(2) cost of preparing documents and any other patent costs in
connection with the filing and prosecution of a United States patent
application where title or royalty-free license is required by the
Federal Government to be conveyed to the Federal Government; and
(3) general counseling services relating to patent and copyright
matters, such as advice on patent and copyright laws, regulations,
clauses, and employee agreements (but see sections J.37, Professional
service costs, and J.44, Royalties and other costs for use of
patents).
-
The following costs
related to patent and copyright matter are unallowable:
(i) Cost of preparing disclosures, reports, and other documents and of
searching the art to the extent necessary to make disclosures not
required by the award
(ii) Costs in connection with filing and prosecuting any foreign
patent application, or any United States patent application, where the
sponsored agreement award does not require conveying title or a
royalty-free license to the Federal Government, (but see section J.44,
Royalties and other costs for use of patents).
35.
Plant and homeland security costs.
Necessary
and reasonable expenses incurred for routine and homeland security to
protect facilities, personnel, and work products are allowable. Such
costs include, but are not limited to, wages and uniforms of personnel
engaged in security activities; equipment; barriers; contractual
security services; consultants; etc. Capital expenditures for homeland
and plant security purposes are subject to section J.18, Equipment and
other capital expenditures, of this Circular.
36.
Preagreement costs.
Costs
incurred prior to the effective date of the sponsored agreement, whether
or not they would have been allowable thereunder if incurred after such
date, are unallowable unless approved by the sponsoring agency.
37.
Professional service costs.
-
Costs of
professional and consultant services rendered by persons who are
members of a particular profession or possess a special skill, and who
are not officers or employees of the institution, are allowable,
subject to subparagraphs b and c when reasonable in relation to the
services rendered and when not contingent upon recovery of the costs
from the Federal Government. In addition, legal and related services
are limited under section J.13.
-
In determining the
allowability of costs in a particular case, no single factor or any
special combination of factors is necessarily determinative. However,
the following factors are relevant:
(1) The nature and scope of the service rendered in relation to the
service required.
(2) The necessity of contracting for the service, considering the
institution's capability in the particular area.
(3) The past pattern of such costs, particularly in the years prior to
sponsored agreements.
(4) The impact on the institution's business (i.e., what new problems
have arisen).
(5) Whether the proportion of Federal work to the institution's total
business is such as to influence the institution in favor of incurring
the cost, particularly where the services rendered are not of a
continuing nature and have little relationship to work under Federal
grants and contracts.
(6) Whether the service can be performed more economically by direct
employment rather than contracting.
(7) The qualifications of the individual or concern rendering the
service and the customary fees charged, especially on non-sponsored
agreements.
(8) Adequacy of the contractual agreement for the service (e.g.,
description of the service, estimate of time required, rate of
compensation, and termination provisions).
-
In addition to the
factors in subparagraph b, retainer fees to be allowable must be
supported by evidence of bona fide services available or rendered.
38.
Proposal costs.
Proposal
costs are the costs of preparing bids or proposals on potential
federally and non federally funded sponsored agreements or projects,
including the development of data necessary to support the institution's
bids or proposals. Proposal costs of the current accounting period of
both successful and unsuccessful bids and proposals normally should be
treated as F&A costs and allocated currently to all activities of the
institution, and no proposal costs of past accounting periods will be
allocable to the current period. However, the institution's established
practices may be to treat proposal costs by some other recognized
method. Regardless of the method used, the results obtained may be
accepted only if found to be reasonable and equitable.
39.
Publication and printing costs.
-
Publication costs
include the costs of printing (including the processes of composition,
plate-making, press work, binding, and the end products produced by
such processes), distribution, promotion, mailing, and general
handling. Publication costs also include page charges in professional
publications.
-
If these costs are
not identifiable with a particular cost objective, they should be
allocated as indirect costs to all benefiting activities of the
institution.
-
Page charges for
professional journal publications are allowable as a necessary part of
research costs where:
(1) The research papers report work supported by the Federal
Government: and
(2) The charges are levied impartially on all research papers
published by the journal, whether or not by federally sponsored
authors.
40.
Rearrangement and alteration costs.
Costs
incurred for ordinary or normal rearrangement and alteration of
facilities are allowable. Special arrangement and alteration costs
incurred specifically for the project are allowable with the prior
approval of the sponsoring agency.
41.
Reconversion costs.
Costs
incurred in the restoration or rehabilitation of the institution's
facilities to approximately the same condition existing immediately
prior to commencement of a sponsored agreement, fair wear and tear
excepted, are allowable.
42.
Recruiting costs.
-
Subject to
subsections b, c, and d, and provided that the size of the staff
recruited and maintained is in keeping with workload requirements,
costs of "help wanted" advertising, operating costs of an employment
office necessary to secure and maintain an adequate staff, costs of
operating an aptitude and educational testing program, travel costs of
employees while engaged in recruiting personnel, travel costs of
applicants for interviews for prospective employment, and relocation
costs incurred incident to recruitment of new employees, are allowable
to the extent that such costs are incurred pursuant to a well managed
recruitment program. Where the institution uses employment agencies,
costs not in excess of standard commercial rates for such services are
allowable.
-
In publications,
costs of help wanted advertising that includes color, includes
advertising material for other than recruitment purposes, or is
excessive in size (taking into consideration recruitment purposes for
which intended and normal institutional practices in this respect),
are unallowable.
-
Costs of help
wanted advertising, special emoluments, fringe benefits, and salary
allowances incurred to attract professional personnel from other
institutions that do not meet the test of reasonableness or do not
conform with the established practices of the institution, are
unallowable.
-
Where relocation costs incurred incident to
recruitment of a new employee have been allowed either as an allocable
direct or F&A cost, and the newly hired employee resigns for reasons
within his control within 12 months after hire, the institution will
be required to refund or credit such relocation costs to the Federal
Government.
43.
Rental costs of buildings and equipment.
-
Subject to the
limitations described in subsections b. through d. of this section,
rental costs are allowable to the extent that the rates are reasonable
in light of such factors as: rental costs of comparable property, if
any; market conditions in the area; alternatives available; and, the
type, life expectancy, condition, and value of the property leased.
Rental arrangements should be reviewed periodically to determine if
circumstances have changed and other options are available.
-
Rental costs under
“sale and lease back” arrangements are allowable only up to the amount
that would be allowed had the institution continued to own the
property. This amount would include expenses such as depreciation or
use allowance, maintenance, taxes, and insurance.
-
Rental costs under
"less-than-arms-length" leases are allowable only up to the amount (as
explained in subsection b) that would be allowed had title to the
property vested in the institution. For this purpose, a
less-than-arms-length lease is one under which one party to the lease
agreement is able to control or substantially influence the actions of
the other. Such leases include, but are not limited to those between
-–
(1) divisions of a institution;
(2) non-Federal entities under common control through common officers,
directors, or members; and
(3) a institution and a director, trustee, officer, or key employee of
the institution or his immediate family, either directly or through
corporations, trusts, or similar arrangements in which they hold a
controlling interest. For example, a institution may establish a
separate corporation for the sole purpose of owning property and
leasing it back to the institution.
-
Rental costs under
leases which are required to be treated as capital leases under GAAP
are allowable only up to the amount (as explained in subsection b)
that would be allowed had the institution purchased the property on
the date the lease agreement was executed. The provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board Statement 13, Accounting for Leases, shall
be used to determine whether a lease is a capital lease. Interest
costs related to capital leases are allowable to the extent they meet
the criteria in section J.26. Unallowable costs include amounts paid
for profit, management fees, and taxes that would not have been
incurred had the institution purchased the facility.
44.
Royalties and other costs for use of patents.
-
Royalties on a
patent or copyright or amortization of the cost of acquiring by
purchase a copyright, patent, or rights thereto, necessary for the
proper performance of the award are allowable unless:
(1) The Federal Government has a license or the right to free use of
the patent or copyright.
(2) The patent or copyright has been adjudicated to be invalid, or has
been administratively determined to be invalid.
(3) The patent or copyright is considered to be unenforceable.
(4) The patent or copyright is expired.
-
Special care should
be exercised in determining reasonableness where the royalties may
have been arrived at as a result of less-than-arm's-length bargaining,
e.g.:
(1) Royalties paid to persons, including corporations, affiliated with
the institution.
(2) Royalties paid to unaffiliated parties, including corporations,
under an agreement entered into in contemplation that a sponsored
agreement award would be made.
(3) Royalties paid under an agreement entered into after an award is
made to a institution.
-
In any case
involving a patent or copyright formerly owned by the institution, the
amount of royalty allowed should not exceed the cost which would have
been allowed had the institution retained title thereto.
45.
Scholarships and student aid costs.
-
Costs of
scholarships, fellowships, and other programs of student aid are
allowable only when the purpose of the sponsored agreement is to
provide training to selected participants and the charge is approved
by the sponsoring agency. However, tuition remission and other forms
of compensation paid as, or in lieu of, wages to students performing
necessary work are allowable provided that --
(1) The individual is conducting activities necessary to the sponsored
agreement;
(2) Tuition remission and other support are provided in accordance
with established educational institutional policy and consistently
provided in a like manner to students in return for similar activities
conducted in nonsponsored as well as sponsored activities; and
(3) During the academic period, the student is enrolled in an advanced
degree program at the institution or affiliated institution and the
activities of the student in relation to the Federally sponsored
research project are related to the degree program;
(4) the tuition or other payments are reasonable compensation for the
work performed and are conditioned explicitly upon the performance of
necessary work; and
(5) it is the institution's practice to similarly compensate students
in nonsponsored as well as sponsored activities.
-
Charges for tuition remission and other forms
of compensation paid to students as, or in lieu of, salaries and wages
shall be subject to the reporting requirements stipulated in Section
J.10, and shall be treated as direct or F&A cost in accordance with
the actual work being performed. Tuition remission may be charged on
an average rate basis.
46.
Selling and marketing.
Costs of
selling and marketing any products or services of the institution are
unallowable (unless allowed under subsection J.1 as allowable public
relations costs or under subsection J.38 as allowable proposal costs).
47.
Specialized service facilities.
-
The costs of
services provided by highly complex or specialized facilities operated
by the institution, such as computers, wind tunnels, and reactors are
allowable, provided the charges for the services meet the conditions
of either subsection 47.b. or 47.c. and, in addition, take into
account any items of income or Federal financing that qualify as
applicable credits under subsection C.5. of this Circular.
-
The costs of such
services, when material, must be charged directly to applicable awards
based on actual usage of the services on the basis of a schedule of
rates or established methodology that
(1) does not discriminate against federally supported activities of
the institution, including usage by the institution for internal
purposes, and
(2) is designed to recover only the aggregate costs of the services.
The costs of each service shall consist normally of both its direct
costs and its allocable share of all F&A costs. Rates shall be
adjusted at least biennially, and shall take into consideration
over/under applied costs of the previous period(s).
-
Where the costs
incurred for a service are not material, they may be allocated as F&A
costs.
-
Under some
extraordinary circumstances, where it is in the best interest of the
Federal Government and the institution to establish alternative
costing arrangements, such arrangements may be worked out with the
cognizant Federal agency.
48.
Student activity costs.
Costs
incurred for intramural activities, student publications, student clubs,
and other student activities, are unallowable, unless specifically
provided for in the sponsored agreements.
49.
Taxes.
-
In general, taxes
which the institution is required to pay and which are paid or accrued
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are
allowable. Payments made to local governments in lieu of taxes which
are commensurate with the local government services received are
allowable, except for--
(1) taxes from which exemptions are available to the institution
directly or which are available to the institution based on an
exemption afforded the Federal Government, and in the latter case when
the sponsoring agency makes available the necessary exemption
certificates; and
(2) special assessments on land which represent capital improvements.
-
Any refund of
taxes, interest, or penalties, and any payment to the institution of
interest thereon, attributable to taxes, interest, or penalties which
were allowed as sponsored agreement costs, will be credited or paid to
the Federal Government in the manner directed by the Federal
Government. However, any interest actually paid or credited to an
institution incident to a refund of tax, interest, and penalty will be
paid or credited to the Federal Government only to the extent that
such interest accrued over the period during which the institution has
been reimbursed by the Federal Government for the taxes, interest, and
penalties.
50.
Termination costs applicable to sponsored agreements.
Termination of awards generally gives rise to the incurrence of costs,
or the need for special treatment of costs, which would not have arisen
had the sponsored agreement not been terminated. Cost principles
covering these items are set forth below. They are to be used in
conjunction with the other provisions of this Circular in termination
situations.
-
The cost of items
reasonably usable on the institution's other work shall not be
allowable unless the institution submits evidence that it would not
retain such items at cost without sustaining a loss. In deciding
whether such items are reasonably usable on other work of the
institution, the awarding agency should consider the institution's
plans and orders for current and scheduled activity.
Contemporaneous purchases of common items by the institution shall be
regarded as evidence that such items are reasonably usable on the
institution's other work. Any acceptance of common items as allocable
to the terminated portion of the sponsored agreement shall be limited
to the extent that the quantities of such items on hand, in transit,
and on order are in excess of the reasonable quantitative requirements
of other work.
-
If in a particular
case, despite all reasonable efforts by the institution, certain costs
cannot be discontinued immediately after the effective date of
termination, such costs are generally allowable within the limitations
set forth in this Circular, except that any such costs continuing
after termination due to the negligent or willful failure of the
institution to discontinue such costs shall be unallowable.
-
Loss of useful
value of special tooling, machinery, and equipment is generally
allowable if:
(1) Such special tooling, special machinery, or equipment is not
reasonably capable of use in the other work of the institution,
(2) The interest of the Federal Government is protected by transfer of
title or by other means deemed appropriate by the awarding agency, and
(3) The loss of useful value for any one terminated sponsored
agreement is limited to that portion of the acquisition cost which
bears the same ratio to the total acquisition cost as the terminated
portion of the sponsored agreement bears to the entire terminated
sponsored agreement award and other sponsored agreements for which the
special tooling, machinery, or equipment was acquired.
-
Rental costs under
unexpired leases are generally allowable where clearly shown to have
been reasonably necessary for the performance of the terminated
sponsored agreement less the residual value of such leases, if:
(1) the amount of such rental claimed does not exceed the reasonable
use value of the property leased for the period of the sponsored
agreement and such further period as may be reasonable, and
(2) the institution makes all reasonable efforts to terminate, assign,
settle, or otherwise reduce the cost of such lease. There also may be
included the cost of alterations of such leased property, provided
such alterations were necessary for the performance of the sponsored
agreement, and of reasonable restoration required by the provisions of
the lease.
-
Settlement expenses
including the following are generally allowable:
(1) Accounting, legal, clerical, and similar costs reasonably
necessary for:
(a) The preparation and presentation to the awarding agency of
settlement claims and supporting data with respect to the terminated
portion of the sponsored agreement, unless the termination is for
default (see Subpart. __.61 of Circular A-110); and
(b) The termination and settlement of subawards.
(2) Reasonable costs for the storage, transportation, protection, and
disposition of property provided by the Federal Government or acquired
or produced for the sponsord agreement, except when institutions are
reimbursed for disposals at a predetermined amount in accordance with
Subparts ___.32 through ___.37 of Circular A-110.
(3) F&A costs related to salaries and wages incurred as settlement
expenses in subsections b.(1) and (2). Normally, such F&A costs shall be
limited to fringe benefits, occupancy cost, and immediate supervision.
-
Claims under
subawards, including the allocable portion of claims which are common
to the sponsored agreement and to other work of the institution, are
generally allowable.
An appropriate share of the institution's F&A costs may be allocated
to the amount of settlements with subcontractors and/or subgrantees,
provided that the amount allocated is otherwise consistent with the
basic guidelines contained in section E, F&A costs. The F&A costs so
allocated shall exclude the same and similar costs claimed directly or
indirectly as settlement expenses.
51.
Training costs.
The cost
of training provided for employee development is allowable.
52. Transportation costs.
Costs
incurred for freight, express, cartage, postage, and other
transportation services relating either to goods purchased, in process,
or delivered, are allowable. When such costs can readily be identified
with the items involved, they may be charged directly as transportation
costs or added to the cost of such items. Where identification with the
materials received cannot readily be made, inbound transportation cost
may be charged to the appropriate F&A cost accounts if the institution
follows a consistent, equitable procedure in this respect. Outbound
freight, if reimbursable under the terms of the sponsored agreement,
should be treated as a direct cost.
53.
Travel costs.
-
General.
Travel costs are the expenses for transportation, lodging,
subsistence, and related items incurred by employees who are in travel
status on official business of the institution. Such costs may be
charged on an actual cost basis, on a per diem or mileage basis in
lieu of actual costs incurred, or on a combination of the two,
provided the method used is applied to an entire trip and not to
selected days of the trip, and results in charges consistent with
those normally allowed in like circumstances in the institution’s
non-federally sponsored activities.
-
Lodging and
subsistence.
Costs incurred by employees and officers for travel, including costs
of lodging, other subsistence, and incidental expenses, shall be
considered reasonable and allowable only to the extent such costs do
not exceed charges normally allowed by the institution in its regular
operations as the result of the institution’s written travel policy.
In the absence of an acceptable, written institution policy regarding
travel costs, the rates and amounts established under subchapter I of
Chapter 57, Title 5, United States Code (“Travel and Subsistence
Expenses; Mileage Allowances”), or by the Administrator of General
Services, or by the President (or his or her designee) pursuant to any
provisions of such subchapter shall apply to travel under sponsored
agreements (48 CFR 31.205-46(a)).
-
Commercial air
travel.
(1) Airfare costs in excess of the customary standard commercial
airfare (coach or equivalent), Federal Government contract airfare
(where authorized and available), or the lowest commercial discount
airfare are unallowable except when such accommodations would:
(a) require circuitous routing;
(b) require travel during unreasonable hours; (c) excessively prolong
travel;
(d) result in additional costs that would offset the transportation
savings; or
(e) offer accommodations not reasonably adequate for the traveler’s
medical needs. The institution must justify and document these
conditions on a case-by-case basis in order for the use of first-class
airfare to be allowable in such cases.
(2) Unless a pattern of avoidance is detected, the Federal Government
will generally not question a institution's determinations that
customary standard airfare or other discount airfare is unavailable for
specific trips if the institution can demonstrate either of the
following:
(a) that such airfare was not available in the specific case; or
(b) that it is the institution’s overall practice to make routine use of
such airfare.
-
Air travel by other
than commercial carrier.
Costs of travel by institution-owned, -leased, or -chartered aircraft
include the cost of lease, charter, operation (including personnel
costs), maintenance, depreciation, insurance, and other related costs.
The portion of such costs that exceeds the cost of allowable
commercial air travel, as provided for in subsection 53.c., is
unallowable.
54.
Trustees.
Travel
and subsistence costs of trustees (or directors) are allowable. The
costs are subject to restrictions regarding lodging, subsistence and air
travel costs provided in Section 53.
K. Certification of charges.
1. To assure that expenditures for sponsored
agreements are proper and in accordance with the agreement documents and
approved project budgets, the annual and/or final fiscal reports or
vouchers requesting payment under the agreements will include a
certification, signed by an authorized official of the university, which
reads essentially as follows: "I certify that all expenditures reported
(or payment requested) are for appropriate purposes and in accordance
with the provisions of the application and award documents."
2. Certification of F&A costs.
-
Policy.
(1) No proposal to establish F&A cost rates shall be acceptable unless
such costs have been certified by the educational institution using
the Certificate of F&A Costs set forth in subsection b. The
certificate must be signed on behalf of the institution by an
individual at a level no lower than vice president or chief financial
officer of the institution that submits the proposal.
(2) No F&A cost rate shall be binding upon the Federal Government if
the most recent required proposal from the institution has not been
certified. Where it is necessary to establish F&A cost rates, and the
institution has not submitted a certified proposal for establishing
such rates in accordance with the requirements of this section, the
Federal Government shall unilaterally establish such rates. Such rates
may be based upon audited historical data or such other data that have
been furnished to the cognizant Federal agency and for which it can be
demonstrated that all unallowable costs have been excluded. When F&A
cost rates are unilaterally established by the Federal Government
because of failure of the institution to submit a certified proposal
for establishing such rates in accordance with this section, the rates
established will be set at a level low enough to ensure that
potentially unallowable costs will not be reimbursed.
-
Certificate. The
certificate required by this section shall be in the following form:
Certificate of F&A Costs
This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
(1) I have reviewed the F&A cost proposal submitted herewith;
(2) All costs included in this proposal [identify date] to establish
billing or final F&A costs rate for [identify period covered by rate]
are allowable in accordance with the requirements of the Federal
agreement(s) to which they apply and with the cost principles
applicable to those agreements.
(3) This proposal does not include any costs which are unallowable
under applicable cost principles such as (without limitation):
advertising and public relations costs, contributions and donations,
entertainment costs, fines and penalties, lobbying costs, and defense
of fraud proceedings; and
(4) All costs included in this proposal are properly allocable to
Federal agreements on the basis of a beneficial or causal relationship
between the expenses incurred and the agreements to which they are
allocated in accordance with applicable requirements.
For educational institutions that are required to file a DS-2 in
accordance with Section C.14, the following statement shall be added
to the "Certificate of F&A Costs":
(5) The rate proposal is prepared using the same cost accounting
practices that are disclosed in the DS-2, including its amendments and
revisions, filed with and approved by the cognizant agency.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Institution: ____________________________________________
Signature: _____________________________________________
Name of Official: ________________________________________
Title: _________________________________________________
Date of Execution: ______________________________________
Exhibit A -- List of Colleges and Universities
Subject to Section J.12.h of Circular A-21.
- Johns Hopkins University
- Stanford University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- University of Washington
- University of California-Los Angeles
- University of Michigan
- University of California-San Diego
- University of California-San Francisco
- University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Columbia University
- Yale University
- Harvard University
- Cornell University
- University of Pennsylvania
- University of California-Berkeley
- University of Minnesota
- Pennsylvania State University
- University of Southern California
- Duke University
- Washington University
- University of Colorado
- University of Illinois-Urbana
- University of Rochester
- University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
- University of Pittsburgh
- University of Chicago
- University of Texas-Austin
- University of Arizona
- New York University
- University of Iowa
- Ohio State University
- University of Alabama-Birmingham
- Case Western Reserve
- Baylor College of Medicine
- California Institute of Technology
- Yeshiva University
- University of Massachusetts
- Vanderbilt University
- Purdue University
- University of Utah
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- University of Maryland-College Park
- University of Miami
- University of California-Davis
- Boston University
- University of Florida
- Carnegie-Mellon University
- Northwestern University
- Indiana University
- Michigan State University
- University of Virginia
- University of Texas-SW Medical Center
- University of California-Irvine
- Princeton University
- Tulane University of Louisiana
- Emory University
- University of Georgia
- Texas A&M University-all campuses
- New Mexico State University
- North Carolina State University-Raleigh
- University of Illinois-Chicago
- Utah State University
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Oregon State University
- SUNY-Stony Brook
- University of Cincinnati
- CUNY-Mount Sinai School of Medicine
- University of Connecticut
- Louisiana State University
- Tufts University
- University of California-Santa Barbara
- University of Hawaii-Manoa
- Rutgers State University of New Jersey
- Colorado State University
- Rockefeller University
- University of Maryland-Baltimore
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University
- SUNY-Buffalo
- Brown University
- University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
- University of Texas-Health Science Center San Antonio
- University of Vermont
- University of Texas-Health Science Center Houston
- Florida State University
- University of Texas-MD Anderson Cancer Center
- University of Kentucky
- Wake Forest University
- Wayne State University
- Iowa State University of Science & Technology
- University of New Mexico
- Georgetown University
- Dartmouth College
- University of Kansas
- Oregon Health Sciences University
- University of Texas-Medical Branch-Galveston
- University of Missouri-Columbia
- Temple University
- George Washington University
- University of Dayton
Exhibit B -- Listing of institutions that are
eligible for the utility cost adjustment.
- Baylor University
- Boston College
- Boston University
- California Institute of Technology
- Carnegie-Mellon University
- Case Western University
- Columbia University
- Cornell University (Endowed)
- Cornell University (Statutory)
- Cornell University (Medical)
- Dayton University
- Emory University
- George Washington University (Medical)
- Georgetown University
- Harvard Medical School
- Harvard University (Main Campus)
- Harvard University (School of Public Health)
- Johns Hopkins University
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine
- New York University (except New York University Medical Center)
- New York University Medical Center
- North Carolina State University
- Northeastern University
- Northwestern University
- Oregon Health Sciences University
- Oregon State University
- Rice University
- Rockefeller University
- Stanford University
- Tufts University
- Tulane University
- Vanderbilt University
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- University of Arizona
- University of CA, Berkeley
- University of CA, Irvine
- University of CA, Los Angeles
- University of CA, San Diego
- University of CA, San Francisco
- University of Chicago
- University of Cincinnati
- University of Colorado, Health Sciences Center
- University of Connecticut, Health Sciences Center
- University of Health Science and The Chicago Medical School
- University of Illinois, Urbana
- University of Massachusetts, Medical Center
- University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey
- University of Michigan
- University of Pennsylvania
- University of Pittsburgh
- University of Rochester
- University of Southern California
- University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- University of Texas, Galveston
- University of Texas, Austin
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
- University of Virginia
- University of Vermont & State Agriculture College
- University of Washington
- Washington University
- Yale University
- Yeshiva University
Exhibit C -- Examples of "major project" where
direct charging of administrative or clerical staff salaries may be
appropriate.
* Large,
complex programs such as General Clinical Research Centers, Primate
Centers, Program Projects, environmental research centers, engineering
research centers, and other grants and contracts that entail assembling
and managing teams of investigators from a number of institutions.
*
Projects which involve extensive data accumulation, analysis and entry,
surveying, tabulation, cataloging, searching literature, and reporting
(such as epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and retrospective
clinical records studies).
*
Projects that require making travel and meeting arrangements for large
numbers of participants, such as conferences and seminars.
*
Projects whose principal focus is the preparation and production of
manuals and large reports, books and monographs (excluding routine
progress and technical reports).
*
Projects that are geographically inaccessible to normal departmental
administrative services, such as research vessels, radio astronomy
projects, and other research fields sites that are remote from campus.
*
Individual projects requiring project-specific database management;
individualized graphics or manuscript preparation; human or animal
protocols; and multiple project-related investigator coordination and
communications.
These
examples are not exhaustive nor are they intended to imply that direct
charging of administrative or clerical salaries would always be
appropriate for the situations illustrated in the examples. For
instance, the examples would be appropriate when the costs of such
activities are incurred in unlike circumstances, i.e., the actual
activities charged direct are not the same as the actual activities
normally included in the institution's facilities and administrative
(F&A) cost pools or, if the same, the indirect activity costs are
immaterial in amount. It would be inappropriate to charge the cost of
such activities directly to specific sponsored agreements if, in similar
circumstances, the costs of performing the same type of activity for
other sponsored agreements were included as allocable costs in the
institution's F&A cost pools. Application of negotiated predetermined
F&A cost rates may also be inappropriate if such activity costs charged
directly were not provided for in the allocation base that was used to
determine the predetermined F&A cost rates.
Appendix A Part 99005 -- Cost
Accounting Standards for Educational Institutions.
CAS 9905.501 -- Consistency in estimating,
accumulating and reporting costs by educational institutions.
Purpose
The
purpose of this standard is to ensure that each educational
institution's practices used in estimating costs for a proposal are
consistent with cost accounting practices used by the educational
institution in accumulating and reporting costs. Consistency in the
application of cost accounting practices is necessary to enhance the
likelihood that comparable transactions are treated alike. With respect
to individual sponsored agreements, the consistent application of cost
accounting practices will facilitate the preparation of reliable cost
estimates used in pricing a proposal and their comparison with the costs
of performance of the resulting sponsored agreement. Such comparisons
provide one important basis for financial control over costs during
sponsored agreement performance and aid in establishing accountability
for costs in the manner agreed to by both parties at the time of
agreement. The comparisons also provide an improved basis for evaluating
estimating capabilities.
Definitions
(a) The
following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this standard.
(1) Accumulating costs means the collecting of
cost data in an organized manner, such as through a system of accounts.
(2)
Actual cost means an amount determined on the basis of cost incurred (as
distinguished from forecasted cost), including standard cost properly
adjusted for applicable variance.
(3)
Estimating costs means the process of forecasting a future result in
terms of cost, based upon information available at the time.
(4)
Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified with
two or more objectives but not identified specifically with any final
cost objective.
(5)
Pricing means the process of establishing the amount or amounts to be
paid in return for goods or services.
(6)
Proposal means any offer or other submission used as a basis for pricing
a sponsored agreement, sponsored agreement modification or termination
settlement or for securing payments thereunder.
(7)
Reporting costs means the providing of cost information to others.
Fundamental Requirement
An
educational institution's practices used in estimating costs in pricing
a proposal shall be consistent with the educational institution's cost
accounting practices used in accumulating and reporting costs.
An
educational institution's cost accounting practices used in accumulating
and reporting actual costs for a sponsored agreement shall be consistent
with the educational institution's practices used in estimating costs in
the related proposal or application.
The
grouping of homogeneous costs in estimates prepared for proposal
purposes shall not per se be deemed an inconsistent application of cost
accounting practices of this paragraph when such costs are accumulated
in reported in greater detail on an actual costs basis during
performance of the sponsored agreement.
Techniques for application
(a) The
standard allows grouping of homogeneous costs in order to cover those
cases where it is not practicable to estimate sponsored agreement costs
by individual cost element. However, costs estimated for proposal
purposes shall be presented in such a manner and in such detail that any
significant cost can be compared with the actual cost accumulated and
reported therefor. In any event, the cost accounting practices used in
estimating costs in pricing a proposal and in accumulating and reporting
costs on the resulting sponsored agreement shall be consistent with
respect to:
(1) The classification of elements of cost as
direct or indirect; (2) the indirect cost pools to which each element of
cost is charged or proposed to be charged; and (3) the methods of
allocating indirect costs to the sponsored agreement.
(b) Adherence to the requirement of this standard shall be
determined as of the date of award of the sponsored agreement, unless
the sponsored agreement has submitted cost or pricing data pursuant to
10 U.S.C. 2306(a) or 41 U.S.C. 254(d) (Pub. L. 87-653), in which case
adherence to the requirement of this standard shall be determined as of
the date of final agreement on price, as shown on the signed certificate
of current cost or pricing data. Notwithstanding 9905.501-40(b), changes
in established cost accounting practices during sponsored agreement
performance may be made in accordance with Part 9903 (48 CFR 9903).
(c) The standard does not prescribe the amount of detail required in
accumulating and reporting costs. The basic requirement which must be
met, however, is that for any significant amount of estimated cost, the
sponsored agreement must be able to accumulate and report actual cost at
a level which permits sufficient and meaningful comparison with its
estimates. The amount of detail required may vary considerably depending
on how the proposed costs were estimated, the data presented in
justification or lack thereof, and the significance of each situation.
Accordingly, it is neither appropriate nor practical to prescribe a
single set of accounting practices which would be consistent in all
situations with the practices of estimating costs. Therefore, the amount
of accounting and statistical detail to be required and maintained in
accounting for estimated costs has been and continues to be a matter to
be decided by Government procurement authorities on the basis of the
individual facts and circumstances.
CAS 9905.502 -- Consistency in allocating costs
incurred for the same purpose by educational institutions.
Purpose
The
purpose of this standard is to require that each type of cost is
allocated only once and on only one basis to any sponsored agreement or
other cost objective. The criteria for determining the allocation of
costs to a sponsored agreement or other cost objective should be the
same for all similar objectives. Adherence to these cost accounting
concepts is necessary to guard against the overcharging of some cost
objectives and to prevent double counting. Double counting occurs most
commonly when cost items are allocated directly to a cost objective
without eliminating like cost items from indirect cost pools which are
allocated to that cost objective.
Definitions
(a) The
following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this standard.
(1) Allocate means to assign an item of cost,
or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives. This term
includes both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share
from an indirect cost pool.
(2) Cost
objective means a function, organizational subdivision, sponsored
agreement, or other work unit for which cost data are desired and for
which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes,
products, jobs, capitalized projects, etc.
(3)
Direct cost means any cost which is identified specifically with a
particular final cost objective. Direct costs are not limited to items
which are incorporated in the end product as material or labor. Costs
identified specifically with a sponsored agreement are direct costs of
that sponsored agreement. All costs identified specifically with other
final cost objectives of the educational institution are direct costs of
those cost objectives.
(4) Final
cost objective means a cost objective which has allocated to it both
direct and indirect costs, and in the educational institution's
accumulation system, is one of the final accumulation points.
(5)
Indirect cost means any cost not directly identified with a single final
cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or
with at least one intermediate cost objective.
(6)
Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified with
two or more cost objectives but not identified with any final cost
objective.
(7)
Intermediate cost objective means a cost objective that is used to
accumulate indirect costs or service center costs that are subsequently
allocated to one or more indirect cost pools and/or final cost
objectives.
Fundamental Requirement
All costs
incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances, are either direct
costs only or indirect costs only with respect to final cost objectives.
No final cost objective shall have allocated to it as an indirect cost
any cost, if other costs incurred for the same purpose, in like
circumstances, have been included as a direct cost of that or any other
final cost objective. Further, no final cost objective shall have
allocated to it as a direct cost any cost, if other costs incurred for
the same purpose, in like circumstances, have been included in any
indirect cost pool to be allocated to that or any other final cost
objective.
Techniques for application
(a) The
Fundamental Requirement is stated in terms of cost incurred and is
equally applicable to estimates of costs to be incurred as used in
sponsored agreement proposals.
(b) The
Disclosure Statement to be submitted by the educational institution will
require that the educational institution set forth its cost accounting
practices with regard to the distinction between direct and indirect
costs. In addition, for those types of cost which are sometimes
accounted for as direct and sometimes accounted for as indirect, the
educational institution will set forth in its Disclosure Statement the
specific criteria and circumstances for making such distinctions. In
essence, the Disclosure Statement submitted by the educational
institution, by distinguishing between direct and indirect costs, and by
describing the criteria and circumstances for allocating those items
which are sometimes direct and sometimes indirect, will be determinative
as to whether or not costs are incurred for the same purpose. Disclosure
Statement as used herein refers to the statement required to be
submitted by educational institutions in Section C.14.
(c) In
the event that an educational institution has not submitted a Disclosure
Statement, the determination of whether specific costs are directly
allocable to sponsored agreements shall be based upon the educational
institution's cost accounting practices used at the time of sponsored
agreement proposal.
(d)
Whenever costs which serve the same purpose cannot equitably be
indirectly allocated to one or more final cost objectives in accordance
with the educational institution's disclosed accounting practices, the
educational institution may either (1) use a method for reassigning all
such costs which would provide an equitable distribution to all final
cost objectives, or (2) directly assign all such costs to final cost
objectives with which they are specifically identified. In the event the
educational institution decides to make a change for either purpose, the
Disclosure Statement shall be amended to reflect the revised accounting
practices involved.
(e) Any
direct cost of minor dollar amount may be treated as an indirect cost
for reasons of practicality where the accounting treatment for such cost
is consistently applied to all final cost objectives, provided that such
treatment produces results which are substantially the same as the
results which would have been obtained if such cost had been treated as
a direct cost.
Illustrations
(a)
Illustrations of costs which are incurred for the same purpose:
(1) An educational institution normally
allocates all travel as an indirect cost and previously disclosed this
accounting practice to the Government. For purposes of a new proposal,
the educational institution intends to allocate the travel costs of
personnel whose time is accounted for as direct labor directly to the
sponsored agreement. Since travel costs of personnel whose time is
accounted for as direct labor working on other sponsored agreements are
costs which are incurred for the same purpose, these costs may no longer
be included within indirect cost pools for purposes of allocation to any
covered Government sponsored agreement. The educational institution's
Disclosure Statement must be amended for the proposed changes in
accounting practices.
(2) An
educational institution normally allocates purchasing activity costs
indirectly and allocates this cost to instruction and research on the
basis of modified total costs. A proposal for a new sponsored agreement
requires a disproportionate amount of subcontract administration to be
performed by the purchasing activity. The educational institution
prefers to continue to allocate purchasing activity costs indirectly. In
order to equitably allocate the total purchasing activity costs, the
educational institution may use a method for allocating all such costs
which would provide an equitable distribution to all applicable indirect
cost pools. For example, the educational institution may use the number
of transactions processed rather than its former allocation base of
modified total costs. The educational institution's Disclosure Statement
must be amended for the proposed changes in accounting practices.
(b)
Illustrations of costs which are not incurred for the same purpose:
(1) An educational institution normally
allocates special test equipment costs directly to sponsored agreements.
The costs of general purpose test equipment are normally included in the
indirect cost pool which is allocated to sponsored agreements. Both of
these accounting practices were previously disclosed to the Government.
Since both types of costs involved were not incurred for the same
purpose in accordance with the criteria set forth in the educational
institution's Disclosure Statement, the allocation of general purpose
test equipment costs from the indirect cost pool to the sponsored
agreement, in addition to the directly allocated special test equipment
costs, is not considered a violation of the standard.
(2) An
educational institution proposes to perform a sponsored agreement which
will require three firemen on 24-hour duty at a fixed-post to provide
protection against damage to highly inflammable materials used on the
sponsored agreement. The educational institution presently has a
firefighting force of 10 employees for general protection of its
facilities. The educational institution's costs for these latter firemen
are treated as indirect costs and allocated to all sponsored agreements;
however, it wants to allocate the three fixed-post firemen directly to
the particular sponsored agreement requiring them and also allocate a
portion of the cost of the general firefighting force to the same
sponsored agreement. The educational institution may do so but only on
condition that its disclosed practices indicate that the costs of the
separate classes of firemen serve different purposes and that it is the
educational institution's practice to allocate the general firefighting
force indirectly and to allocate fixed-post firemen directly.
Interpretation
(a)
Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose by
Educational Institutions, provides, in this standard, that " * * * no
final cost objective shall have allocated to it as a direct cost any
cost, if other costs incurred for the same purpose, in like
circumstances, have been included in any indirect cost pool to be
allocated to that or any other final cost objective."
(b) This
interpretation deals with the way this standard applies to the treatment
of costs incurred in preparing, submitting, and supporting proposals. In
essence, it is addressed to whether or not, under the standard, all such
costs are incurred for the same purpose, in like circumstances.
(c) Under
this standard, costs incurred in preparing, submitting, and supporting
proposals pursuant to a specific requirement of an existing sponsored
agreement are considered to have been incurred in different
circumstances from the circumstances under which costs are incurred in
preparing proposals which do not result from such specific requirement.
The circumstances are different because the costs of preparing proposals
specifically required by the provisions of an existing sponsored
agreement relate only to that sponsored agreement while other proposal
costs relate to all work of the educational institution.
(d) This
interpretation does not preclude the allocation, as indirect costs, of
costs incurred in preparing all proposals. The cost accounting practices
used by the educational institution, however, must be followed
consistently and the method used to reallocate such costs, of course,
must provide an equitable distribution to all final cost objectives.
CAS 9905.505 -- Accounting for unallowable costs --
Educational institutions.
Purpose
(a) The
purpose of this standard is to facilitate the negotiation, audit,
administration and settlement of sponsored agreements by establishing
guidelines covering (1) identification of costs specifically described
as unallowable, at the time such costs first become defined or
authoritatively designated as unallowable, and (2) the cost accounting
treatment to be accorded such identified unallowable costs in order to
promote the consistent application of sound cost accounting principles
covering all incurred costs. The standard is predicated on the
proposition that costs incurred in carrying on the activities of an
educational institution -- regardless of the allowability of such costs
under Government sponsored agreements -- are allocable to the cost
objectives with which they are identified on the basis of their
beneficial or causal relationships.
(b) This
standard does not govern the allowability of costs. This is a function
of the appropriate procurement or reviewing authority.
Definitions
(a) The
following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this standard.
(1) Directly associated cost means any cost
which is generated solely as a result of the incurrence of another cost,
and which would not have been incurred had the other cost not been
incurred.
(2)
Expressly unallowable cost means a particular item or type of cost
which, under the express provisions of an applicable law, regulation, or
sponsored agreement, is specifically named and stated to be unallowable.
(3)
Indirect cost means any cost not directly identified with a single final
cost objective, but identified with two or more final cost objectives or
with at least one intermediate cost objective.
(4)
Unallowable cost means any cost which, under the provisions of any
pertinent law, regulation, or sponsored agreement, cannot be included in
prices, cost reimbursements, or settlements under a Government sponsored
agreement to which it is allocable.
Fundamental requirement
(a) Costs
expressly unallowable or mutually agreed to be unallowable, including
costs mutually agreed to be unallowable directly associated costs, shall
be identified and excluded from any billing, claim, application, or
proposal applicable to a Government sponsored agreement.
(b) Costs
which specifically become designated as unallowable as a result of a
written decision furnished by a Federal official pursuant to sponsored
agreement disputes procedures shall be identified if included in or used
in the computation of any billing, claim, or proposal applicable to a
sponsored agreement. This identification requirement applies also to any
costs incurred for the same purpose under like circumstances as the
costs specifically identified as unallowable under either this paragraph
or paragraph (a) of this subsection.
(c) Costs
which, in a Federal official's written decision furnished pursuant to
disputes procedures, are designated as unallowable directly associated
costs of unallowable costs covered by either paragraph (a) or (b) of
this subsection shall be accorded the identification required by
paragraph b. of this subsection.
(d) The
costs of any work project not contractually authorized, whether or not
related to performance of a proposed or existing contract, shall be
accounted for, to the extent appropriate, in a manner which permits
ready separation from the costs of authorized work projects.
(e) All
unallowable costs covered by paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
subsection shall be subject to the same cost accounting principles
governing cost allocability as allowable costs. In circumstances where
these unallowable costs normally would be part of a regular
indirect-cost allocation base or bases, they shall remain in such base
or bases. Where a directly associated cost is part of a category of
costs normally included in an indirect-cost pool that will be allocated
over a base containing the unallowable cost with which it is associated,
such a directly associated cost shall be retained in the indirect-cost
pool and be allocated through the regular allocation process.
(f) Where
the total of the allocable and otherwise allowable costs exceeds a
limitation-of-cost or ceiling-price provision in a sponsored agreement,
full direct and indirect cost allocation shall be made to the cost
objective, in accordance with established cost accounting practices and
Standards which regularly govern a given entity's allocations to
Government sponsored agreement cost objectives. In any determination of
unallowable cost overrun, the amount thereof shall be identified in
terms of the excess of allowable costs over the ceiling amount, rather
than through specific identification of particular cost items or cost
elements.
Techniques for application
(a) The
detail and depth of records required as backup support for proposals,
billings, or claims shall be that which is adequate to establish and
maintain visibility of identified unallowable costs (including directly
associated costs), their accounting status in terms of their
allocability to sponsored agreement cost objectives, and the cost
accounting treatment which has been accorded such costs. Adherence to
this cost accounting principle does not require that allocation of
unallowable costs to final cost objectives be made in the detailed cost
accounting records. It does require that unallowable costs be given
appropriate consideration in any cost accounting determinations
governing the content of allocation bases used for distributing indirect
costs to cost objectives. Unallowable costs involved in the
determination of rates used for standard costs, or for indirect-cost
bidding or billing, need be identified only at the time rates are
proposed, established, revised or adjusted.
(b) The
visibility requirement of paragraph (a) of this subsection, may be
satisfied by any form of cost identification which is adequate for
purposes of sponsored agreement cost determination and verification. The
standard does not require such cost identification for purposes which
are not relevant to the determination of Government sponsored agreement
cost. Thus, to provide visibility for incurred costs, acceptable
alternative practices would include (1) the segregation of unallowable
costs in separate accounts maintained for this purpose in the regular
books of account, (2) the development and maintenance of separate
accounting records or workpapers, or (3) the use of any less formal cost
accounting techniques which establishes and maintains adequate cost
identification to permit audit verification of the accounting
recognition given unallowable costs. Educational institutions may
satisfy the visibility requirements for estimated costs either (1) by
designation and description (in backup data, workpapers, etc.) of the
amounts and types of any unallowable costs which have specifically been
identified and recognized in making the estimates, or (2) by description
of any other estimating technique employed to provide appropriate
recognition of any unallowable costs pertinent to the estimates.
(c)
Specific identification of unallowable costs is not required in
circumstances where, based upon considerations of materiality, the
Government and the educational institution reach agreement on an
alternate method that satisfies the purpose of the standard.
Illustrations
(a) An
auditor recommends disallowance of certain direct labor and direct
material costs, for which a billing has been submitted under a sponsored
agreement, on the basis that these particular costs were not required
for performance and were not authorized by the sponsored agreement. The
Federal officer issues a written decision which supports the auditor's
position that the questioned costs are unallowable. Following receipt of
the Federal officer's decision, the educational institution must clearly
identify the disallowed direct labor and direct material costs in the
educational institution's accounting records and reports covering any
subsequent submission which includes such costs. Also, if the
educational institution's base for allocation of any indirect cost pool
relevant to the subject sponsored agreement consists of direct labor,
direct material, total prime cost, total cost input, etc., the
educational institution must include the disallowed direct labor and
material costs in its allocation base for such pool. Had the Federal
officer's decision been against the auditor, the educational institution
would not, of course, have been required to account separately for the
costs questioned by the auditor.
(b) An
educational institution incurs, and separately identifies, as a part of
a service center or expense pool, certain costs which are expressly
unallowable under the existing and currently effective regulations. If
the costs of the service center or indirect expense pool are regularly a
part of the educational institution's base for allocation of general
administration and general expenses (GA&GE) or other indirect expenses,
the educational institution must allocate the GA&GE or other indirect
expenses to sponsored agreements and other final cost objectives by
means of a base which includes the identified unallowable indirect
costs.
(c) An
auditor recommends disallowance of certain indirect costs. The
educational institution claims that the costs in question are allowable
under the provisions of Office Of Management and Budget Circular A-21,
Cost Principles For Educational Institutions; the auditor disagrees. The
issue is referred to the Federal officer for resolution pursuant to the
sponsored agreement disputes clause. The Federal officer issues a
written decision supporting the auditor's position that the total costs
questioned are unallowable under the Circular. Following receipt of the
Federal officer's decision, the educational institution must identify
the disallowed costs and specific other costs incurred for the same
purpose in like circumstances in any subsequent estimating, cost
accumulation or reporting for Government sponsored agreements, in which
such costs are included. If the Federal officer's decision had supported
the educational institution's contention, the costs questioned by the
auditor would have been allowable and the educational institution would
not have been required to provide special identification.
(d) An
educational institution incurred certain unallowable costs that were
charged indirectly as general administration and general expenses
(GA&GE). In the educational institution's proposals for final indirect
cost rates to be applied in determining allowable sponsored agreement
costs, the educational institution identified and excluded the expressly
unallowable costs. In addition, during the course of negotiation of
indirect cost rates to be used for bidding and billing purposes, the
educational institution agreed to classify as unallowable cost, various
directly associated costs of the identifiable unallowable costs. On the
basis of negotiations and agreements between the educational institution
and the Federal officer's authorized representatives, indirect cost
rates were established, based on the net balance of allowable GA&GE.
Application of the rates negotiated to proposals, and to billings, for
covered sponsored agreements constitutes compliance with the standard.
(e) An
employee, whose salary, travel, and subsistence expenses are charged
regularly to the general administration and general expenses (GA&GE)
pool, takes several business associates on what is clearly a business
entertainment trip. The entertainment costs of such trips is expressly
unallowable because it constitutes entertainment expense prohibited by
OMB Circular A-21, and is separately identified by the educational
institution. The educational institution does not regularly include its
GA&GE in any indirect-expense allocation base. In these circumstances,
the employee's travel and subsistence expenses would be directly
associated costs for identification with the unallowable entertainment
expense. However, unless this type of activity constituted a significant
part of the employee's regular duties and responsibilities on which his
salary was based, no part of the employee's salary would be required to
be identified as a directly associated cost of the unallowable
entertainment expense.
CAS 9905.506 -- Cost accounting period --
Educational institutions.
Purpose
The
purpose of this standard is to provide criteria for the selection of the
time periods to be used as cost accounting periods for sponsored
agreement cost estimating, accumulating, and reporting. This standard
will reduce the effects of variations in the flow of costs within each
cost accounting period. It will also enhance objectivity, consistency,
and verifiability, and promote uniformity and comparability in sponsored
agreement cost measurements.
Definitions
(a) The
following are definitions of terms which are prominent in this standard.
(1) Allocate means to assign an item of cost,
or a group of items of cost, to one or more cost objectives. This term
includes both direct assignment of cost and the reassignment of a share
from an indirect cost pool.
(2) Cost
Objective means a function, organizational subdivision, sponsored
agreement, or other work unit for which cost data are desired and for
which provision is made to accumulate and measure the cost of processes,
products, jobs, capitalized projects, etc.
(3)
Fiscal year means the accounting period for which annual financial
statements are regularly prepared, generally a period of 12 months, 52
weeks, or 53 weeks.
(4)
Indirect cost pool means a grouping of incurred costs identified with
two or more cost objectives but not identified specifically with any
final cost objective.
Fundamental requirement
Educational institutions shall use their fiscal year as their cost
accounting period, except that:
Costs of
an indirect function which exists for only a part of a cost accounting
period may be allocated to cost objectives of that same part of the
period.
An annual
period other than the fiscal year may be used as the cost accounting
period if its use is an established practice of the educational
institution.
A
transitional cost accounting period other than a year shall be used
whenever a change of fiscal year occurs.
An
educational institution shall follow consistent practices in the
selection of the cost accounting period or periods in which any types of
expense and any types of adjustment to expense (including prior-period
adjustments) are accumulated and allocated.
The same
cost accounting period shall be used for accumulating costs in an
indirect cost pool as for establishing its allocation base, except that
the contracting parties may agree to use a different period for
establishing an allocation base.
Techniques for application
(a) The
cost of an indirect function which exists for only a part of a cost
accounting period may be allocated on the basis of data for that part of
the cost accounting period if the cost is (1) material in amount, (2)
accumulated in a separate indirect cost pool or expense pool, and (3)
allocated on the basis of an appropriate direct measure of the activity
or output of the function during that part of the period.
(b) The
practices required by this standard shall include appropriate practices
for deferrals, accruals, and other adjustments to be used in identifying
the cost accounting periods among which any types of expense and any
types of adjustment to expense are distributed. If an expense, such as
insurance or employee leave, is identified with a fixed, recurring,
annual period which is different from the educational institution's cost
accounting period, the standard permits continued use of that different
period. Such expenses shall be distributed to cost accounting periods in
accordance with the educational institution's established practices for
accruals, deferrals, and other adjustments.
(c)
Indirect cost allocation rates, based on estimates, which are used for
the purpose of expediting the closing of sponsored agreements which are
terminated or completed prior to the end of a cost accounting period
need not be those finally determined or negotiated for that cost
accounting period. They shall, however, be developed to represent a full
cost accounting period, except as provided in paragraph (a) of this
subsection.
(d) An
educational institution may, upon mutual agreement with the Government,
use as its cost accounting period a fixed annual period other than its
fiscal year, if the use of such a period is an established practice of
the educational institution and is consistently used for managing and
controlling revenues and disbursements, and appropriate accruals,
deferrals or other adjustments are made with respect to such annual
periods.
(e) The
parties may agree to use an annual period which does not coincide
precisely with the cost accounting period for developing the data used
in establishing an allocation base: Provided,
(1) The practice is necessary to obtain
significant administrative convenience, (2) the practice is consistently
followed by the educational institution, (3) the annual period used is
representative of the activity of the cost accounting period for which
the indirect costs to be allocated are accumulated, and (4) the practice
can reasonably be estimated to provide a distribution to cost objectives
of the cost accounting period not materially different from that which
otherwise would be obtained.
(f) When
a transitional cost accounting period is required, educational
institution may select any one of the following: (1) the period, less
than a year in length, extending from the end of its previous cost
accounting period to the beginning of its next regular cost accounting
period, (2) a period in excess of a year, but not longer than 15 months,
obtained by combining the period described in subparagraph (f)(1) of
this subsection with the previous cost accounting period, or (3) a
period in excess of a year, but not longer than 15 months, obtained by
combining the period described in subparagraph (f)(1) of this subsection
with the next regular cost accounting period. A change in the
educational institution's cost accounting period is a change in
accounting practices for which an adjustment in the sponsored agreement
price may be required.
Illustrations
(a) An
educational institution allocates indirect expenses for Organized
Research on the basis of a modified total direct cost base. In a
proposal for a sponsored agreement, it estimates the allocable expenses
based solely on the estimated amount of indirect costs allocated to
Organized Research and the amount of the modified total direct cost base
estimated to be incurred during the 8 months in which performance is
scheduled to be commenced and completed. Such a proposal would be in
violation of the requirements of this standard that the calculation of
the amounts of both the indirect cost pools and the allocation bases be
based on the educational institution's cost accounting period.
(b) An
educational institution whose cost accounting period is the calendar
year, installs a computer service center to begin operations on May 1.
The operating expense related to the new service center is expected to
be material in amount, will be accumulated in an intermediate cost
objective, and will be allocated to the benefitting cost objectives on
the basis of measured usage. The total operating expenses of the
computer service center for the 8-month part of the cost accounting
period may be allocated to the benefitting cost objectives of that same
8-month period.
(c) An
educational institution changes its fiscal year from a calendar year to
the 12-month period ending May 31. For financial reporting purposes, it
has a 5-month transitional "fiscal year." The same 5-month period must
be used as the transitional cost accounting period; it may not be
combined, because the transitional period would be longer than 15
months. The new fiscal year must be adopted thereafter as its regular
cost accounting period. The change in its cost accounting period is a
change in accounting practices; adjustments of the sponsored agreement
prices may thereafter be required.
(d)
Financial reports are prepared on a calendar year basis on a
university-wide basis. However, the contracting segment does all
internal financial planning, budgeting, and internal reporting on the
basis of a twelve month period ended June 30. The contracting parties
agree to use the period ended June 30 and they agree to overhead
rates on the June 30 basis. They also agree on a technique for prorating
fiscal year assignment of the university's central system office
expenses between such June 30 periods. This practice is permitted by the
standard.
(e) Most
financial accounts and sponsored agreement cost records are maintained
on the basis of a fiscal year which ends November 30 each year. However,
employee vacation allowances are regularly managed on the basis of a
"vacation year" which ends September 30 each year. Vacation expenses are
estimated uniformly during each "vacation year." Adjustments are made
each October to adjust the accrued liability to actual, and the
estimating rates are modified to the extent deemed appropriate. This use
of a separate annual period for determining the amounts of vacation
expense is permitted.
[ABS
HOME] [ABS UNITS]
[ABS TOPIC SEARCH] [CAMPUS
HOME] |